» Articles » PMID: 25727453

Understanding the Influence of All Nodes in a Network

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Mar 3
PMID 25727453
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Centrality measures such as the degree, k-shell, or eigenvalue centrality can identify a network's most influential nodes, but are rarely usefully accurate in quantifying the spreading power of the vast majority of nodes which are not highly influential. The spreading power of all network nodes is better explained by considering, from a continuous-time epidemiological perspective, the distribution of the force of infection each node generates. The resulting metric, the expected force, accurately quantifies node spreading power under all primary epidemiological models across a wide range of archetypical human contact networks. When node power is low, influence is a function of neighbor degree. As power increases, a node's own degree becomes more important. The strength of this relationship is modulated by network structure, being more pronounced in narrow, dense networks typical of social networking and weakening in broader, looser association networks such as the Internet. The expected force can be computed independently for individual nodes, making it applicable for networks whose adjacency matrix is dynamic, not well specified, or overwhelmingly large.

Citing Articles

Identification of key regulators in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma using network theoretical approach.

Bhattacharjee K, Ghosh A PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313738.

PMID: 39869563 PMC: 11771905. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313738.


A network analysis of ICD-11 Complex PTSD, emotional processing, and dissociative experiences in the context of psychological trauma at different developmental stages.

Mohammadi Z, Dehghani M, Lavasani F, Farahani H, Ashouri A Front Psychiatry. 2024; 15:1372620.

PMID: 38532985 PMC: 10963615. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1372620.


Brief Communication: The Predictable Network Topology of Evolutionary Genomic Constraint.

Wollenberg Valero K Mol Biol Evol. 2024; 41(3).

PMID: 38366776 PMC: 10906983. DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msae033.


The spatiotemporal analysis of the population migration network in China, 2021.

Li W, Yao Y Infect Dis Model. 2023; 8(4):1117-1126.

PMID: 37915999 PMC: 10616395. DOI: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.10.003.


Dauer fate in a Boolean network model.

Kandoor A, Fierst J PeerJ. 2023; 11:e14713.

PMID: 36710867 PMC: 9879150. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.14713.


References
1.
Boguna M, Pastor-Satorras R, Diaz-Guilera A, Arenas A . Models of social networks based on social distance attachment. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2004; 70(5 Pt 2):056122. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.70.056122. View

2.
Son S, Christensen C, Grassberger P, Paczuski M . PageRank and rank-reversal dependence on the damping factor. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013; 86(6 Pt 2):066104. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.86.066104. View

3.
Barabasi , ALBERT . Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science. 1999; 286(5439):509-12. DOI: 10.1126/science.286.5439.509. View

4.
Estrada E, Rodriguez-Velazquez J . Subgraph centrality in complex networks. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2005; 71(5 Pt 2):056103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.71.056103. View

5.
Klemm K, Serrano M, Eguiluz V, San Miguel M . A measure of individual role in collective dynamics. Sci Rep. 2012; 2:292. PMC: 3289910. DOI: 10.1038/srep00292. View