Conceptual Control Across Modalities: Graded Specialisation for Pictures and Words in Inferior Frontal and Posterior Temporal Cortex
Overview
Psychology
Affiliations
Controlled semantic retrieval to words elicits co-activation of inferior frontal (IFG) and left posterior temporal cortex (pMTG), but research has not yet established (i) the distinct contributions of these regions or (ii) whether the same processes are recruited for non-verbal stimuli. Words have relatively flexible meanings - as a consequence, identifying the context that links two specific words is relatively demanding. In contrast, pictures are richer stimuli and their precise meaning is better specified by their visible features - however, not all of these features will be relevant to uncovering a given association, tapping selection/inhibition processes. To explore potential differences across modalities, we took a commonly-used manipulation of controlled retrieval demands, namely the identification of weak vs. strong associations, and compared word and picture versions. There were 4 key findings: (1) Regions of interest (ROIs) in posterior IFG (BA44) showed graded effects of modality (e.g., words>pictures in left BA44; pictures>words in right BA44). (2) An equivalent response was observed in left mid-IFG (BA45) across modalities, consistent with the multimodal semantic control deficits that typically follow LIFG lesions. (3) The anterior IFG (BA47) ROI showed a stronger response to verbal than pictorial associations, potentially reflecting a role for this region in establishing a meaningful context that can be used to direct semantic retrieval. (4) The left pMTG ROI also responded to difficulty across modalities yet showed a stronger response overall to verbal stimuli, helping to reconcile two distinct literatures that have implicated this site in semantic control and lexical-semantic access respectively. We propose that left anterior IFG and pMTG work together to maintain a meaningful context that shapes ongoing semantic processing, and that this process is more strongly taxed by word than picture associations.
Dumitrescu A, Coolen T, Wens V, Rovai A, Trotta N, Goldman S Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(2):e70109.
PMID: 39835602 PMC: 11747998. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70109.
Semantic Integration Demands Modulate Large-Scale Network Interactions in the Brain.
Nieberlein L, Martin S, Williams K, Gussew A, Cyriaks S, Scheer M Hum Brain Mapp. 2024; 45(18):e70113.
PMID: 39723465 PMC: 11669845. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70113.
What we mean when we say semantic: Toward a multidisciplinary semantic glossary.
Reilly J, Shain C, Borghesani V, Kuhnke P, Vigliocco G, Peelle J Psychon Bull Rev. 2024; 32(1):243-280.
PMID: 39231896 PMC: 11836185. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-024-02556-7.
Haitas N, Dubuc J, Masse-Leblanc C, Chamberland V, Amiri M, Glatard T PLoS One. 2024; 19(6):e0289384.
PMID: 38917084 PMC: 11198863. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289384.
Wu W, Hoffman P Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(6.
PMID: 38897815 PMC: 11186671. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae256.