Comparative Study of DL-selenomethionine Vs Sodium Selenite and Seleno-yeast on Antioxidant Activity and Selenium Status in Laying Hens
Overview
Affiliations
The aim of this study was to compare the effect of DL-selenomethionine (SM) with 2 routinely used Se sources, sodium selenite (SS) and seleno-yeast (SY), on relative bioavailability based on antioxidant activity and tissue Se content. Six hundred thirty 131-day-old brown laying hens were randomly assigned to 7 treatments for 168 d (24 wks) with 6 replicates of 15 hens per replicate. The SS and SY animals were supplemented a cornmeal and soybean diet that supplied a total Se 0.3 mg/kg whereas SM was added at 4 different levels to the total Se at 0.1, 0.3, 0.5 and 0.7 mg/kg. All hens fed the Se-supplemented diet showed higher glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) activity (P < 0.01), higher superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity (P < 0.05), lower malondialdehyde (MDA) content (P < 0.05) in plasma, and greater Se contents in egg yolks, albumen, leg muscle, breast muscle, liver, and plasma compared with those fed the control diet (P < 0.01). The organic sources (SY and SM) exhibited a greater ability to increase the GSH-Px activity (P < 0.01) and Se content in albumen (P < 0.01), leg, and breast muscles (P = 0.0099 and P = 0.0014, respectively) than the SS that was added at 0.3 mg Se/kg. The higher SM added levels increased the GSH-Px activity until the dose of 0.5mg Se/kg (P < 0.01).The greater Se concentrations in albumen, muscle and liver appeared in the higher SM-added level, as well as above the dose of 0.1 mg Se/kg (P < 0.01). In addition, hens fed the diet with SM accumulated more Se in albumen, leg, and breast muscle than those fed diets with SY (P < 0.05). These results confirmed the higher ability of organic Se sources to increase the antioxidant activity and Se deposition in egg albumen, leg, and breast muscles compared with SS, and demonstrated a significantly better efficiency of SM compared with SY for albumen and muscle Se enrichment.
Liu G, Cao S, Huang L, Lin X, Sun Z, Lin G Front Vet Sci. 2025; 11:1542557.
PMID: 39897155 PMC: 11782124. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1542557.
Ataollahi F, Amirheidari B, Amirheidari Z, Ataollahi M Biotechnol Lett. 2025; 47(1):18.
PMID: 39826010 DOI: 10.1007/s10529-024-03559-z.
Yan M, Cong X, Wang H, Qin K, Tang Y, Xu X Poult Sci. 2024; 104(1):104620.
PMID: 39647356 PMC: 11666952. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.104620.
Sarker M, Shang X, Chen W, Xu R, Wang S, Xia W Biol Trace Elem Res. 2024; .
PMID: 39180631 DOI: 10.1007/s12011-024-04308-z.
Lari M, Afsharmanesh M, Bami M Poult Sci. 2024; 103(8):103943.
PMID: 38964271 PMC: 11278323. DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2024.103943.