» Articles » PMID: 25713667

The Effect of Climbing Ability and Slope Inclination on Vertical Foot Loading Using a Novel Force Sensor Instrumentation System

Overview
Journal J Hum Kinet
Publisher Termedia
Date 2015 Feb 26
PMID 25713667
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the effects of climbing ability and slope inclination on vertical loading both in terms the forces involved and physiological responses. Five novice and six intermediate female climbers completed a climbing route at three slope inclinations (85°, 90°, and 98°). The vertical loading during the climb was assessed by force-time integral using a Novel Pedar-X insole and physiological responses via oxygen uptake and heart rate. The novice climbers had a significantly lower (p < 0.05) vertical loading on foot holds and higher oxygen uptake and heart rate compared to intermediate climbers. A significant negative correlation was identified between the force-time integral and oxygen uptake (R = -0.72), and with heart rate (R = -0.64), respectively. The time-force integral decreased across the ascents with increasing slope inclination (p < 0.001). The results indicate that more advanced ability climbers make greater use of foot holds, with associated lowering in physiological response (oxygen uptake and heart rate) across all slope inclinations.

Citing Articles

Assessing the Impact of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation-Based Fingerboard Training versus Conventional Fingerboard Training on Finger Flexor Endurance in Intermediate to Advanced Sports Climbers: A Randomized Controlled Study.

Dindorf C, Dully J, Berger J, Becker S, Wolf E, Simon S Sensors (Basel). 2024; 24(13).

PMID: 39000879 PMC: 11244570. DOI: 10.3390/s24134100.


Downclimbing and the evolution of ape forelimb morphologies.

Fannin L, Joy M, Dominy N, McGraw W, DeSilva J R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(9):230145.

PMID: 37680499 PMC: 10480693. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230145.


Wearable and Non-Invasive Sensors for Rock Climbing Applications: Science-Based Training and Performance Optimization.

Breen M, Reed T, Nishitani Y, Jones M, Breen H, Breen M Sensors (Basel). 2023; 23(11).

PMID: 37299807 PMC: 10255440. DOI: 10.3390/s23115080.


Physical performance testing in climbing-A systematic review.

Langer K, Simon C, Wiemeyer J Front Sports Act Living. 2023; 5:1130812.

PMID: 37229362 PMC: 10203485. DOI: 10.3389/fspor.2023.1130812.


Time Management Strategies of Rock Climbers in World Cup Bouldering Finals.

Mckellar B, Coates A, Cohen J, Burr J J Hum Kinet. 2023; 86:165-174.

PMID: 37181256 PMC: 10170546. DOI: 10.5114/jhk/159652.


References
1.
Bertuzzi R, Franchini E, Kokubun E, Kiss M . Energy system contributions in indoor rock climbing. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007; 101(3):293-300. DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0501-0. View

2.
Zampagni M, Brigadoi S, Schena F, Tosi P, Ivanenko Y . Idiosyncratic control of the center of mass in expert climbers. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2011; 21(5):688-99. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0838.2010.01098.x. View

3.
Noe F, Quaine F, Martin L . Influence of steep gradient supporting walls in rock climbing: biomechanical analysis. Gait Posture. 2001; 13(2):86-94. DOI: 10.1016/s0966-6362(00)00098-9. View

4.
Mermier C, Robergs R, McMinn S, Heyward V . Energy expenditure and physiological responses during indoor rock climbing. Br J Sports Med. 1997; 31(3):224-8. PMC: 1332525. DOI: 10.1136/bjsm.31.3.224. View

5.
Watts P, Drobish K . Physiological responses to simulated rock climbing at different angles. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30(7):1118-22. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-199807000-00015. View