» Articles » PMID: 25708208

Intraocular Lens Power Calculation for Eyes with an Axial Length Greater Than 26.0 Mm: Comparison of Formulas and Methods

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2015 Feb 25
PMID 25708208
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the accuracy of formulas and methods for calculating the intraocular lens (IOL) power for eyes with an axial length (AL) greater than 26.0 mm.

Setting: Ein-Tal Eye Center, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: The postoperative refraction results in myopic eyes with an AL over 26.0 mm were compared with the predicted refractions calculated using standard formulas (Holladay 1, SRK/T, Hoffer Q, and Haigis) with optical IOL constants, User Group for Laser Interference Biometry constants, and an AL-adjustment method and using new-generation formulas (Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, and Olsen).

Results: In 76 (71.7%) of 106 eyes, the IOL was 6.0 diopters (D) or more (Group A) and in 30 eyes (28.3%) was less than 6.0 D (Group B). In Group A, the SRK/T, Hoffer Q, Haigis, Barrett Universal II, Holladay 2, and Olsen methods met the benchmark criteria of having a prediction error of ±0.5 D in at least 71.0% of eyes and ±1.0 D in 93.0% of eyes. In Group B, only the Barrett Universal II formula and the Holladay 1 and Haigis formulas using the AL-adjusted method met those criteria.

Conclusion: When selecting IOLs for high and extreme myopia, choosing appropriate formulas and methods can yield accurate refractive results that meet benchmark criteria.

Financial Disclosure: No author has a financial or proprietary interest in any material or method mentioned.

Citing Articles

Implantation of trifocal intraocular lens in mild pathologic myopia: visual outcomes and influence of fundus structures.

Zhu M, Zeng Z, Fan W, Zhang G BMC Ophthalmol. 2025; 25(1):108.

PMID: 40038626 PMC: 11881268. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-025-03931-1.


Evaluation of prediction errors in nine intraocular lens calculation formulas using an explainable machine learning model.

Oh R, Oh J, Choi H, Kim M, Yoon C BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):531.

PMID: 39696028 PMC: 11657498. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03801-2.


Posterior Eye Shape in Myopia.

Jonas J, Panda-Jonas S, Pan Z, Xu J, Wang Y Ophthalmol Sci. 2024; 4(6):100575.

PMID: 39253551 PMC: 11381855. DOI: 10.1016/j.xops.2024.100575.


A Comprehensive Evaluation of 16 Old and New Intraocular Lens Power Calculation Formulas in Pediatric Eyes.

Achiron A, Yahalomi T, Biran A, Levinger E, Cohen E, Elbaz U Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:2225-2238.

PMID: 39135944 PMC: 11318601. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S470425.


Stereoacuity and Aniseikonia: Evaluation Before and After Bilateral Implantation of Three Types of Presbyopia-Correcting Intraocular Lenses in Uncomplicated Phacoemulsification with Due Consideration of Interocular Differences in Higher Order....

Mravicic I, Lukacevic S, Barisic A, Patel S, Bohac M, Biscevic A Clin Ophthalmol. 2024; 18:1637-1650.

PMID: 38855012 PMC: 11162624. DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S459684.