» Articles » PMID: 25707876

Re-defining Response and Treatment Effects for Neuro-oncology Immunotherapy Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Feb 25
PMID 25707876
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In much of medical oncology, including neuro-oncology, there is great interest to evaluate the therapeutic potential of immune-based therapies including vaccines, adoptive T cell strategies and modulators of immune checkpoint regulators such as cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 and programmed death 1. Immune-based treatments exert an indirect anti-tumor effect by generating potent, tumor-targeting immune responses. Robust anti-tumor immune responses have been shown to achieve encouraging radiographic responses across the spectrum of applied immunotherapeutics which are felt to be indicative of a bona fide anti-tumor effect. Conversely, worsening of imaging findings, particularly early in the course of immunotherapy administration, can be challenging to interpret with growing evidence demonstrating that at least a subset of such patients ultimately will derive meaningful clinical benefit. The immune related response criteria were generated to provide guidance regarding the interpretation of such complex imaging findings, for general medical oncologists prescribing immunotherapeutics. An analogous effort that addresses challenges associated with imaging assessment and incorporates nuances associated with neuro-oncology patients is underway and is referred to as the immunotherapy response assessment in neuro-oncology criteria.

Citing Articles

Melanoma brain metastases treated with stereotactic radiosurgery and concurrent pembrolizumab display marked regression; efficacy and safety of combined treatment.

Anderson E, Postow M, Wolchok J, Young R, Ballangrud A, Chan T J Immunother Cancer. 2017; 5(1):76.

PMID: 29037215 PMC: 5644249. DOI: 10.1186/s40425-017-0282-x.


A single dose of peripherally infused EGFRvIII-directed CAR T cells mediates antigen loss and induces adaptive resistance in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

ORourke D, Nasrallah M, Desai A, Melenhorst J, Mansfield K, Morrissette J Sci Transl Med. 2017; 9(399).

PMID: 28724573 PMC: 5762203. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa0984.


Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway in glioma: a potential new treatment strategy.

Xue S, Hu M, Iyer V, Yu J J Hematol Oncol. 2017; 10(1):81.

PMID: 28388955 PMC: 5384128. DOI: 10.1186/s13045-017-0455-6.


Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gliomas.

Tan A, Heimberger A, Khasraw M Curr Oncol Rep. 2017; 19(4):23.

PMID: 28303490 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-017-0586-5.


Advances in the treatment of newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Theeler B, Gilbert M BMC Med. 2015; 13:293.

PMID: 26646075 PMC: 4673777. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-015-0536-8.


References
1.
Wolchok J, Kluger H, Callahan M, Postow M, Rizvi N, Lesokhin A . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(2):122-33. PMC: 5698004. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369. View

2.
Srinivasan R, Phillips J, VandenBerg S, Polley M, Bourne G, Au A . Ex vivo MR spectroscopic measure differentiates tumor from treatment effects in GBM. Neuro Oncol. 2010; 12(11):1152-61. PMC: 3098023. DOI: 10.1093/neuonc/noq075. View

3.
Ott P, Hodi F, Robert C . CTLA-4 and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade: new immunotherapeutic modalities with durable clinical benefit in melanoma patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2013; 19(19):5300-9. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0143. View

4.
Kruit W, van Ojik H, Brichard V, Escudier B, Dorval T, Dreno B . Phase 1/2 study of subcutaneous and intradermal immunization with a recombinant MAGE-3 protein in patients with detectable metastatic melanoma. Int J Cancer. 2005; 117(4):596-604. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.21264. View

5.
Maude S, Frey N, Shaw P, Aplenc R, Barrett D, Bunin N . Chimeric antigen receptor T cells for sustained remissions in leukemia. N Engl J Med. 2014; 371(16):1507-17. PMC: 4267531. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1407222. View