» Articles » PMID: 25707035

Patient and Provider Attitudes Toward the Use of Patient Portals for the Management of Chronic Disease: a Systematic Review

Overview
Publisher JMIR Publications
Date 2015 Feb 24
PMID 25707035
Citations 164
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Patient portals provide patients with the tools to better manage and understand their health status. However, widespread adoption of patient portals faces resistance from patients and providers for a number of reasons, and there is limited evidence evaluating the characteristics of patient portals that received positive remarks from patients and providers.

Objective: The objectives of this systematic review are to identify the shared characteristics of portals that receive favorable responses from patients and providers and to identify the elements that patients and providers believe need improvement.

Methods: The authors conducted a systematic search of the CINAHL and PubMed databases to gather data about the use of patient portals in the management of chronic disease. Two reviewers analyzed the articles collected in the search process in order remove irrelevant articles. The authors selected 27 articles to use in the literature review.

Results: Results of this systematic review conclude that patient portals show significant improvements in patient self-management of chronic disease and improve the quality of care provided by providers. The most prevalent positive attribute was patient-provider communication, which appeared in 10 of 27 articles (37%). This was noted by both patients and providers. The most prevalent negative perceptions are security (concerns) and user-friendliness, both of which occurred in 11 of 27 articles (41%). The user-friendliness quality was a concern for patients and providers who are not familiar with advanced technology and therefore find it difficult to navigate the patient portal. The high cost of installation and maintenance of a portal system, not surprisingly, deters some providers from implementing such technology into their practice, but this was only mentioned in 3 of the 27 articles (11%). It is possible that the incentives for meaningful use assuage the barrier of cost.

Conclusions: This systematic review revealed mixed attitudes from patients and their providers regarding the use of patient portals to manage their chronic disease. The authors suggest that a standard patient portal design providing patients with the resources to understand and manage their chronic conditions will promote the adoption of patient portals in health care organizations.

Citing Articles

Evidence-Based Design of Prescription Medication Information: An Updated Scoping Review.

Russell A, Lovett R, Vogeley A, Nunes D, McKelvie C, Middleton W Drug Saf. 2025; .

PMID: 40075034 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-025-01527-8.


Perceptions, Experiences, and Beliefs About Patient Portals Among Women With Limited English Proficiency: Multicultural Qualitative Interview Study.

Han H, Chepkorir J, Kim T, Zamora M, Huang E J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e60699.

PMID: 40009438 PMC: 11904362. DOI: 10.2196/60699.


Examining Health Care Provider Experiences With Patient Portal Implementation: Mixed Methods Study.

Taneja S, Kalia K, Tang T, Wodchis W, Vanderhout S J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27:e65967.

PMID: 39888658 PMC: 11829176. DOI: 10.2196/65967.


Patient-Centric Mobile Medical Services Accessed Through Smartphones in the Top 100 Chinese Public Hospitals: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.

Huang X, Wang Y, Yang X, Jiang R, Liu Y, Wang H JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e45763.

PMID: 39631758 PMC: 11656109. DOI: 10.2196/45763.


Feasibility of a Web-Based and Mobile-Supported Follow-Up Treatment Pathway for Adult Patients With Orthopedic Trauma in the Netherlands: Concurrent Mixed Methods Study.

Willinge G, Spierings J, Romijnders K, Mathijssen E, Twigt B, Goslings J JMIR Form Res. 2024; 8:e57579.

PMID: 39622674 PMC: 11612530. DOI: 10.2196/57579.


References
1.
Luzio S, Piehlmeier W, Tovar C, Eberl S, Latzsch G, Fallbohmer E . Results of the pilot study of DIADEM: a comprehensive disease management programme for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006; 76(3):410-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.diabres.2006.09.025. View

2.
Beaudoin D, Rocha R, Tse T . Enhancing access to patient education information: a pilot usability study. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2006; :892. PMC: 1560886. View

3.
Osborn C, Mayberry L, Wallston K, Johnson K, Elasy T . Understanding patient portal use: implications for medication management. J Med Internet Res. 2013; 15(7):e133. PMC: 3713921. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2589. View

4.
De Jong C, Ros W, Schrijvers G . The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res. 2014; 16(1):e19. PMC: 3913926. DOI: 10.2196/jmir.3000. View

5.
Lau M, Campbell H, Tang T, Thompson D, Elliott T . Impact of patient use of an online patient portal on diabetes outcomes. Can J Diabetes. 2014; 38(1):17-21. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2013.10.005. View