» Articles » PMID: 25704406

The Influence of Do-not-resuscitate Status on the Outcomes of Patients Undergoing Emergency Vascular Operations

Overview
Journal J Vasc Surg
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Feb 24
PMID 25704406
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders allow patients to communicate their wishes regarding cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Although DNR status may influence physician decision making regarding resuscitation, the effect of DNR status on outcomes of patients undergoing emergency vascular operation remains unknown. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of DNR status on the outcomes of emergency vascular surgery.

Methods: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients requiring emergency vascular surgical interventions between 2005 and 2010. Demographics, clinical data, and outcomes were extracted. Patients were compared according to DNR status. The primary outcome measure was 30-day mortality.

Results: During the study period, 16,678 patients underwent emergency vascular operations (10.8% of the total vascular surgery population). Of those, 548 patients (3.3%) had a DNR status. The differences in rates of open or endovascular repair or of intraoperative blood requirement between the two groups were not significant. After adjusting for differences in demographics and clinical data, DNR patients were more likely to have higher rates of graft failure (8.7% vs 2.4%; adjusted P < .01) and failure to wean from mechanical ventilation (14.9 % vs 9.9%; adjusted P < .001). DNR status was associated with a 2.5-fold rise in 30-day mortality (35.0% vs 14.0%; 95% confidence interval, 1.7-2.9; adjusted P < .001).

Conclusions: The presence of a DNR order was independently associated with mortality. Patient and family counseling on surgical expectations before emergency vascular operations is warranted because the risks of perioperative events are significantly elevated when a DNR order exists.

Citing Articles

Advancing screening tool for hospice needs and end-of-life decision-making process in the emergency department.

Wang Y, Hsu C, Yen A, Chen H, Lai C BMC Palliat Care. 2024; 23(1):51.

PMID: 38389106 PMC: 10885365. DOI: 10.1186/s12904-024-01391-w.


Role of artificial intelligence and machine learning in the diagnosis of cerebrovascular disease.

Gilotra K, Swarna S, Mani R, Basem J, Dashti R Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1254417.

PMID: 37746051 PMC: 10516608. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1254417.


Code status orders in hospitalized patients with COVID-19.

Comer A, Fettig L, Bartlett S, Sinha S, DCruz L, Odgers A Resusc Plus. 2023; 15:100452.

PMID: 37662642 PMC: 10470381. DOI: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100452.


Perceptions of ICU Care Following Do-Not-Resuscitate Orders: A Military Perspective.

Dishman S, Driggers K, Johnson L, Olsen C, Ryan A, McLawhorn M Crit Care Explor. 2020; 2(7):e0153.

PMID: 32766553 PMC: 7368880. DOI: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000153.


Global Vascular Guidelines on the Management of Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia.

Conte M, Bradbury A, Kolh P, White J, Dick F, Fitridge R Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019; 58(1S):S1-S109.e33.

PMID: 31182334 PMC: 8369495. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.05.006.