A Cohort Study of Influences, Health Outcomes and Costs of Patients' Health-seeking Behaviour for Minor Ailments from Primary and Emergency Care Settings

Overview

Journal BMJ Open

Specialty General Medicine

Date 2015 Feb 20

PMID 25694456

Citations 55

Authors

M C Watson

J Ferguson

G R Barton

V Maskrey

A Blyth

V Paudyal

C M Bond

R Holland

T Porteous

T H Sach

D Wright

S Fielding

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Objectives: To compare health-related and cost-related outcomes of consultations for symptoms suggestive of minor ailments in emergency departments (EDs), general practices and community pharmacies.

Design: Observational study; prospective cohort design.

Setting: EDs (n=2), general practices (n=6) and community pharmacies (n=10) in a mix of rural/urban and deprived/affluent areas across North East Scotland and East Anglia. Participants Adults (≥18 years) presenting between 09:00 and 18:00 (Monday-Friday) in general practices and 09:00-18:00 (Monday-Saturday) in pharmacies and EDs with ≥1 of the following: musculoskeletal pain; eye discomfort; gastrointestinal disturbance; or upper respiratory tract-related symptoms.

Interventions: Participants completed three questionnaires: baseline (prior to index consultation); satisfaction with index consultation and follow-up (2 weeks after index consultation).

Main Outcome Measures: Symptom resolution, quality of life, costs, satisfaction and influences on care-seeking behaviour.

Results: 377 patients participated, recruited from EDs (81), general practices (162) and community pharmacies (134). The 2-week response rate was 70% (264/377). Symptom resolution was similar across all three settings: ED (37.3%), general practice (35.7%) and pharmacy (44.3%). Mean overall costs per consultation were significantly lower for pharmacy (£29.30 (95% CI £21.60 to £37.00)) compared with general practice (£82.34 (95% CI £63.10 to £101.58)) and ED (£147.09 (95% CI £125.32 to £168.85)). Satisfaction varied across settings and by measure used. Compared with pharmacy and general practice use, ED use was significantly (p<0.001) associated with first episode and short duration of symptom(s), as well as higher levels of perceived seriousness and urgency for seeking care. Convenience of location was the most common reason for choice of consultation setting.

Conclusions: These results suggest similar health-related outcomes and substantially lower costs with pharmacy consultations for minor ailments. Effective strategies are now needed to shift demand for minor ailment management away from EDs and general practices to the community pharmacy setting.

Citing Articles

Exploring medicine classification and accessibility: a qualitative study.

Khairi Wazien Pengiran Umar A, Goh H, Rizidah Murang Z, Hermansyah A, Rehman I, Goh K J Pharm Policy Pract. 2025; 18(1):2426137.

PMID: 39911586 PMC: 11795752. DOI: 10.1080/20523211.2024.2426137.

Pilot and quantitative evaluation of the TARGET acne toolkit by UK pharmacy professionals working in general practice.

Sonnex K, Thornley T, Fleming N, Lakha A, Lecky D, Pillay I BMJ Open. 2024; 14(7):e081641.

PMID: 38977362 PMC: 11256045. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-081641.

Perspectives of pharmacy staff on provision of self-care and minor ailment education in primary schools: a qualitative study.

Osman S, Paudyal V, Jalal Z, Hirsch C Int J Clin Pharm. 2024; 46(5):1200-1207.

PMID: 38861044 PMC: 11399281. DOI: 10.1007/s11096-024-01753-7.

Clinical relevance and implementation into daily practice of pharmacist-prescribed medication for the management of minor ailments.

Amador-Fernandez N, Botnaru I, Allemann S, Kalin V, Berger J Front Pharmacol. 2024; 14:1256172.

PMID: 38333225 PMC: 10851422. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1256172.

The landscape of self-care in Australia: A pharmacy perspective.

Dineen-Griffin S, Benrimoj S Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024; 13:100396.

PMID: 38174289 PMC: 10762451. DOI: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2023.100396.

References

Watson M, WALKER A, Bond C . Community pharmacists' views and beliefs about the treatment of symptoms suggestive of vaginal thrush in community pharmacies. Pharm World Sci. 2000; 22(4):130-5. DOI: 10.1023/a:1008724513640. View

Little P, Somerville J, Williamson I, Warner G, Moore M, Wiles R . Randomised controlled trial of self management leaflets and booklets for minor illness provided by post. BMJ. 2001; 322(7296):1214-6, 1217. PMC: 31621. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1214. View

Paddison C, Abel G, Roland M, Elliott M, Lyratzopoulos G, Campbell J . Drivers of overall satisfaction with primary care: evidence from the English General Practice Patient Survey. Health Expect. 2013; 18(5):1081-92. PMC: 5060812. DOI: 10.1111/hex.12081. View

Paudyal V, Watson M, Sach T, Porteous T, Bond C, Wright D . Are pharmacy-based minor ailment schemes a substitute for other service providers? A systematic review. Br J Gen Pract. 2013; 63(612):e472-81. PMC: 3693804. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp13X669194. View

Mathison D, Chamberlain J, Cowan N, Engstrom R, Fu L, Shoo A . Primary care spatial density and nonurgent emergency department utilization: a new methodology for evaluating access to care. Acad Pediatr. 2013; 13(3):278-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.acap.2013.02.006. View

Durand A, Gentile S, Devictor B, Palazzolo S, Vignally P, Gerbeaux P . ED patients: how nonurgent are they? Systematic review of the emergency medicine literature. Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 29(3):333-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2010.01.003. View

Lo S, McKechnie S . Perceptions of service quality and sacrifice in patients with minor medical conditions using emergency care. Int J Clin Pract. 2007; 61(4):596-602. DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-1241.2006.00974.x. View

Chalder M, Montgomery A, Hollinghurst S, Cooke M, Munro J, Lattimer V . Comparing care at walk-in centres and at accident and emergency departments: an exploration of patient choice, preference and satisfaction. Emerg Med J. 2007; 24(4):260-4. PMC: 2658231. DOI: 10.1136/emj.2006.042499. View

Porteous T, Ryan M, Bond C, Hannaford P . Preferences for self-care or professional advice for minor illness: a discrete choice experiment. Br J Gen Pract. 2006; 56(533):911-7. PMC: 1934050. View

10.

Campbell M, Wulf Silver R, Hoch J, Ostbye T, Stewart M, Barnsley J . Re-utilization outcomes and costs of minor acute illness treated at family physician offices, walk-in clinics, and emergency departments. Can Fam Physician. 2006; 51:82-3. PMC: 1479579. View

11.

Watson M, Bond C, Grimshaw J, Johnston M . Factors predicting the guideline compliant supply (or non-supply) of non-prescription medicines in the community pharmacy setting. Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15(1):53-7. PMC: 2564005. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.2005.014720. View

12.

Manca A, Hawkins N, Sculpher M . Estimating mean QALYs in trial-based cost-effectiveness analysis: the importance of controlling for baseline utility. Health Econ. 2004; 14(5):487-96. DOI: 10.1002/hec.944. View

13.

Brooks R . EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996; 37(1):53-72. DOI: 10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6. View

14.

Briggs A, Clark T, Wolstenholme J, Clarke P . Missing... presumed at random: cost-analysis of incomplete data. Health Econ. 2003; 12(5):377-92. DOI: 10.1002/hec.766. View

15.

Hutchison B, Ostbye T, Barnsley J, Stewart M, Mathews M, Campbell M . Patient satisfaction and quality of care in walk-in clinics, family practices and emergency departments: the Ontario Walk-In Clinic Study. CMAJ. 2003; 168(8):977-83. PMC: 152680. View

16.

Watson M, Bond C, Grimshaw J, Mollison J, Ludbrook A, WALKER A . Educational strategies to promote evidence-based community pharmacy practice: a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT). Fam Pract. 2002; 19(5):529-36. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.5.529. View

17.

Meakin R, Weinman J . The 'Medical Interview Satisfaction Scale' (MISS-21) adapted for British general practice. Fam Pract. 2002; 19(3):257-63. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/19.3.257. View