» Articles » PMID: 25693663

Automated Attenuation-based Tube Voltage Selection for Body CTA: Performance Evaluation of 192-slice Dual-source CT

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Feb 20
PMID 25693663
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To assess radiation dose and image quality in body CT-angiography (CTA) with automated attenuation-based tube voltage selection (ATVS) on a 192-slice dual-source CT (DSCT).

Methods: Forty patients (69.5 ± 9.6 years) who had undergone body CTA with ATVS (ref.kVp 100, ref.mAs 90) using a 2x192-slice CT in single-source mode were retrospectively included. All patients had undergone prior CTA with a 2x128-slice CT and ATVS with identical imaging and contrast media protocols, serving for comparison. Images were reconstructed with iterative reconstruction at similar strength levels. Radiation dose was determined. Image quality was assessed semi-quantitatively (1:excellent, 5:non-diagnostic), aortic attenuation, noise and CNR were determined.

Results: As compared to 128-slice DSCT, 192-slice DSCT selected tube voltages were lower in 30 patients (75 %), higher in 3 (7.5 %), and similar in 7 patients (17.5 %). CTDIvol was lower with 192-slice DSCT (4.7 ± 1.9 mGy vs. 5.8 ± 2.1 mGy; p < 0.001). Subjective image quality, mean aortic attenuation (342 ± 67HU vs. 268 ± 67HU) and CNR (9.8 ± 2.5 vs. 8.2 ± 2.9) were higher with 192-slice DSCT (all p < 0.01), all datasets being diagnostic.

Conclusion: Our study suggests that ATVS of 192-slice DSCT for body CTA is associated with an improved image quality and further radiation dose reduction of 19 % compared to 128-slice DSCT.

Key Points: • 192-slice DSCT allows imaging from 70 kVp to 150 kVp at 10 kVp increments. • 192-slice DSCT allows for radiation-dose reduction in body-CTA with ATVS. • Subjective and objective image quality increase compared to 128-slice DSCT.

Citing Articles

Perivascular fat attenuation index value and plaque volume increased in non-target lesions of coronary arteries after stenting.

Zuo L, Tian Z, Zhou B, Hou M, Chen Y, Han P Eur Radiol. 2023; 34(7):4233-4242.

PMID: 38057594 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-023-10468-8.


Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality between the 2nd Generation and 3rd Generation Dual-Source Single-Energy and Dual-Source Dual-Energy CT of the Abdomen.

Kim C, Kim S, Cho S, Ryeom H, Kim W, Kim H J Korean Soc Radiol. 2022; 83(6):1342-1353.

PMID: 36545414 PMC: 9748459. DOI: 10.3348/jksr.2021.0104.


Head and neck single- and dual-energy CT: differences in radiation dose and image quality of 2nd and 3rd generation dual-source CT.

Lenga L, Lange M, Martin S, Albrecht M, Booz C, Yel I Br J Radiol. 2021; 94(1122):20210069.

PMID: 33914613 PMC: 8173672. DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20210069.


Surveillance Imaging following Endovascular Aneurysm Repair: State of the Art.

Kim S, Litt H Semin Intervent Radiol. 2020; 37(4):356-364.

PMID: 33041481 PMC: 7540641. DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1715882.


Dual-source abdominopelvic computed tomography: Comparison of image quality and radiation dose of 80 kVp and 80/150 kVp with tin filter.

Choi S, Ahn S, Park S, Park S, Pak S, Choi J PLoS One. 2020; 15(9):e0231431.

PMID: 32881876 PMC: 7470424. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231431.


References
1.
Meinel F, Canstein C, Schoepf U, Sedlmaier M, Schmidt B, Harris B . Image quality and radiation dose of low tube voltage 3rd generation dual-source coronary CT angiography in obese patients: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014; 24(7):1643-50. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-014-3194-x. View

2.
Siegel M, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Hildebolt C, Bradley D, Schmidt B . Automated low-kilovoltage selection in pediatric computed tomography angiography: phantom study evaluating effects on radiation dose and image quality. Invest Radiol. 2013; 48(8):584-9. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e318289f918. View

3.
Schindera S, Graca P, Patak M, Abderhalden S, von Allmen G, Vock P . Thoracoabdominal-aortoiliac multidetector-row CT angiography at 80 and 100 kVp: assessment of image quality and radiation dose. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44(10):650-5. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181acaf8a. View

4.
Kalva S, Sahani D, Hahn P, Saini S . Using the K-edge to improve contrast conspicuity and to lower radiation dose with a 16-MDCT: a phantom and human study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006; 30(3):391-7. DOI: 10.1097/00004728-200605000-00008. View

5.
Maldjian P, Goldman A . Reducing radiation dose in body CT: a primer on dose metrics and key CT technical parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 200(4):741-7. DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9768. View