» Articles » PMID: 25687897

A Nomogram to Estimate the HbA1c Response to Different DPP-4 Inhibitors in Type 2 Diabetes: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 98 Trials with 24 163 Patients

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Feb 18
PMID 25687897
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To develop a nomogram for estimating the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) response to different dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in type 2 diabetes.

Design: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of DPP-4 inhibitors (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin and alogliptin) on HbA1c were conducted. Electronic searches were carried out up to December 2013. Trials were included if they were carried out on participants with type 2 diabetes, lasted at least 12 weeks, included at least 30 participants and had a final assessment of HbA1c. A random effect model was used to pool data. A nomogram was used to represent results of the metaregression model.

Participants: Adults with type 2 diabetes.

Interventions: Any DPP-4 inhibitor (vildagliptin, sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin or alogliptin).

Outcome Measures: The HbA1c response to each DPP-4 inhibitor within 1 year of therapy.

Results: We screened 928 citations and reviewed 98 articles reporting 98 RCTs with 100 arms in 24 163 participants. There were 26 arms with vildagliptin, 37 with sitagliptin, 13 with saxagliptin, 13 with linagliptin and 11 with alogliptin. For all 100 arms, the mean baseline HbA1c value was 8.05% (64 mmol/mol); the decrease of HbA1c from baseline was -0.77% (95% CI -0.82 to -0.72%), with high heterogeneity (I(2)=96%). Multivariable metaregression model that included baseline HbA1c, type of DPP-4 inhibitor and fasting glucose explained 58% of variance between studies, with no significant interaction between them. Other factors, including age, previous diabetes drugs and duration of treatment added low predictive power (<1%). The nomogram estimates the absolute HbA1c reduction from baseline using the type of DPP-4 inhibitor, baseline values of HbA1c and fasting glucose.

Conclusions: Baseline HbA1c level and fasting glucose explain most of the variance in HbA1c change in response to DPP-4 inhibitors: each increase of 1.0% units HbA1c provides a 0.4-0.5% units greater fall.

Citing Articles

Sex differences in type 2 diabetes.

Kautzky-Willer A, Leutner M, Harreiter J Diabetologia. 2023; 66(6):986-1002.

PMID: 36897358 PMC: 10163139. DOI: 10.1007/s00125-023-05891-x.


Learn from failures and stay hopeful to GPR40, a GPCR target with robust efficacy, for therapy of metabolic disorders.

Guan H, Xiong Y Front Pharmacol. 2022; 13:1043828.

PMID: 36386134 PMC: 9640913. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1043828.


Efficacy of omarigliptin, once-weekly dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Kawasaki E, Nakano Y, Fukuyama T, Uchida A, Sagara Y, Tamai H World J Diabetes. 2022; 12(12):2087-2095.

PMID: 35047122 PMC: 8696643. DOI: 10.4239/wjd.v12.i12.2087.


Effects of Teneligliptin on HbA1c levels, Continuous Glucose Monitoring-Derived Time in Range and Glycemic Variability in Elderly Patients with T2DM (TEDDY Study).

Bae J, Kwak S, Kim H, Kim S, Hwang Y, Suh S Diabetes Metab J. 2021; 46(1):81-92.

PMID: 34130378 PMC: 8831812. DOI: 10.4093/dmj.2021.0016.


Pharmacogenetics of new classes of antidiabetic drugs.

Imamovic Kadric S, Kulo Cesic A, Dujic T Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2021; 21(6):659-671.

PMID: 33974529 PMC: 8554705. DOI: 10.17305/bjbms.2021.5646.


References
1.
Raz I, Riddle M, Rosenstock J, Buse J, Inzucchi S, Home P . Personalized management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: reflections from a Diabetes Care Editors' Expert Forum. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36(6):1779-88. PMC: 3661796. DOI: 10.2337/dc13-0512. View

2.
Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

3.
Esposito K, Bellastella G, Giugliano D . When metformin fails in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Arch Intern Med. 2011; 171(4):365-6. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2011.4. View

4.
Higgins J, Thompson S . Controlling the risk of spurious findings from meta-regression. Stat Med. 2004; 23(11):1663-82. DOI: 10.1002/sim.1752. View

5.
. Standards of medical care in diabetes--2014. Diabetes Care. 2013; 37 Suppl 1:S14-80. DOI: 10.2337/dc14-S014. View