» Articles » PMID: 25685338

Patient Factors May Predict Anastomotic Complications After Rectal Cancer Surgery: Anastomotic Complications in Rectal Cancer

Overview
Publisher Wolters Kluwer
Specialty Medical Education
Date 2015 Feb 17
PMID 25685338
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Anastomotic complications following rectal cancer surgery occur with varying frequency. Preoperative radiation, BMI, and low anastomoses have been implicated as predictors in previous studies, but their definitive role is still under review. The objective of our study was to identify patient and operative factors that may be predictive of anastomotic complications.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on patients who had sphincter-preservation surgery performed for rectal cancer at a tertiary medical center between 2005 and 2011.

Results: 123 patients were included in this study, mean age was 59 (26-86), 58% were male. There were 33 complications in 32 patients (27%). Stenosis was the most frequent complication (24 of 33). 11 patients required mechanical dilatation, and 4 had operative revision of the anastomosis. Leak or pelvic abscess were present in 9 patients (7.3%); 4 were explored, 2 were drained and 3 were managed conservatively. 4 patients had permanent colostomy created due to anastomotic complications. Laparoscopy approach, BMI, age, smoking and tumor distance from anal verge were not significantly associated with anastomotic complications. After a multivariate analysis chemoradiation was significantly associated with overall anastomotic complications (Wall = 0.35, p = 0.05), and hemoglobin levels were associated with anastomotic leak (Wald = 4.09, p = 0.04).

Conclusion: Our study identifies preoperative anemia as possible risk factor for anastomotic leak and neoadjuvant chemoradiation may lead to increased risk of complications overall. Further prospective studies will help to elucidate these findings as well as identify amenable factors that may decrease risk of anastomotic complications after rectal cancer surgery.

Citing Articles

Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak in Patients Undergoing Surgery for Rectal Cancer Resection: A Retrospective Analysis.

Doniz Gomez Llanos D, Leal Hidalgo C, Arechavala Lopez S, Padilla Flores A, Correa Rovelo J, Athie Athie A Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e79647.

PMID: 40008105 PMC: 11857925. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.79647.


Serum nutritional predictive biomarkers and risk assessment for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic surgery in rectal cancer patients.

Shayimu P, Awula M, Wang C, Jiapaer R, Pan Y, Wu Z World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024; 16(10):3142-3154.

PMID: 39575267 PMC: 11577407. DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i10.3142.


An Institutional Shift from Routine to Selective Diversion of Low Anastomosis in Robotic TME Surgery for Rectal Cancer Patients Using the KHANS Technique: A Single-Centre Cohort Study.

Duhoky R, Piozzi G, Rutgers M, Mykoniatis I, Siddiqi N, Naqvi S J Pers Med. 2024; 14(7).

PMID: 39063979 PMC: 11278481. DOI: 10.3390/jpm14070725.


A comprehensive evaluation of 80 consecutive robotic low anterior resections: impact of not mobilizing the splenic flexure alongside low-tie vascular ligation as a standardized technique.

Calleja R, Medina-Fernandez F, Bergillos-Gimenez M, Duran M, Torres-Tordera E, Diaz-Lopez C J Robot Surg. 2024; 18(1):156.

PMID: 38565813 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01917-7.


Clinical Outcomes of Ileostomy Closure during versus after Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Rectal Cancer.

He F, Yang F, Tang C, Chen D, Zhao D, Xiong J Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024; 2024:2410643.

PMID: 38550348 PMC: 10977340. DOI: 10.1155/2024/2410643.


References
1.
Konishi T, Watanabe T, Kishimoto J, Nagawa H . Risk factors for anastomotic leakage after surgery for colorectal cancer: results of prospective surveillance. J Am Coll Surg. 2006; 202(3):439-44. DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.10.019. View

2.
Akiyoshi T, Ueno M, Fukunaga Y, Nagayama S, Fujimoto Y, Konishi T . Incidence of and risk factors for anastomotic leakage after laparoscopic anterior resection with intracorporeal rectal transection and double-stapling technique anastomosis for rectal cancer. Am J Surg. 2011; 202(3):259-64. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.11.014. View

3.
Sciume C, Geraci G, Pisello F, Arnone E, Romeo M, Modica G . [Mechanical versus manual anastomoses in colorectal surgery. Personal experience]. G Chir. 2008; 29(11-12):505-10. View

4.
Tuson J, Everett W . A retrospective study of colostomies, leaks and strictures after colorectal anastomosis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 1990; 5(1):44-8. DOI: 10.1007/BF00496150. View

5.
Luchtefeld M, Milsom J, Senagore A, Surrell J, Mazier W . Colorectal anastomotic stenosis. Results of a survey of the ASCRS membership. Dis Colon Rectum. 1989; 32(9):733-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF02562119. View