» Articles » PMID: 25681238

Prehospital Fluid Management of Abdominal Organ Trauma Patients--a Matched Pair Analysis

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2015 Feb 15
PMID 25681238
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Severe bleeding after trauma frequently leads to a poor outcome. Prehospital fluid replacement therapy is considered an important primary treatment option. We conducted a retrospective matched pair analysis to assess the influence of prehospital fluid replacement volume on the clinical course of patients with solid abdominal organ trauma.

Methods: Data were analyzed from 51,425 patients in TraumaRegister DGU® of the German Trauma Society. Inclusion criteria were as follows: injury severity score ≥ 16 points, primary admission, age ≥ 16 years, no isolated brain injury, transfusion of at least one unit of packed red blood cells (pRBCs), and systolic blood pressure ≥ 20 mmHg at the accident site. The patients were divided into "low-volume" (0-1000 ml) and "high-volume" (≥ 1,500 ml) groups according to the matched pair criteria. In each group, 68 patients met the inclusion criteria.

Results: Higher volume in fluid replacement was associated with increased need for transfusion (pRBCs: low-volume: 7.71 units, high-volume: 9.16 units; p = 0.074) and with by trend reduced clotting ability (prothrombin time: low-volume: 71.47 %, high-volume: 66.47 %; p = 0.27). The percentage of patients in shock (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) upon admission was equal in the two groups (25.0 %; p = 1). The mortality rate was discretely higher in the high-volume group (low-volume: 11.8 %, high-volume: 19.1 %; p = 0.089).

Conclusions: Excessive prehospital fluid replacement is able to lead in an increased mortality rate in patients with solid abdominal organ injury. Our results support the concept of restrained fluid replacement in the preclinical treatment of severe trauma patients.

Citing Articles

Association between prehospital fluid resuscitation with crystalloids and outcome of trauma patients in Asia by a cross-national multicenter cohort study.

Sung C, Sun J, Huang E, Shin S, Song K, Hong K Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4100.

PMID: 35260580 PMC: 8902907. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06933-x.


Prehospital volume resuscitation--Did evidence defeat the crystalloid dogma? An analysis of the TraumaRegister DGU® 2002-2012.

Driessen A, Frohlich M, Schafer N, Mutschler M, Defosse J, Brockamp T Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016; 24:42.

PMID: 27048395 PMC: 4822225. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-016-0233-4.

References
1.
Hussmann B, Taeger G, Lefering R, Waydhas C, Nast-Kolb D, Ruchholtz S . [Lethality and outcome in multiple injured patients after severe abdominal and pelvic trauma. Influence of preclinical volume replacement - an analysis of 604 patients from the trauma registry of the DGU]. Unfallchirurg. 2010; 114(8):705-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00113-010-1842-4. View

2.
Geeraedts Jr L, Kaasjager H, van Vugt A, Frolke J . Exsanguination in trauma: A review of diagnostics and treatment options. Injury. 2009; 40(1):11-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2008.10.007. View

3.
Oestern H . [Management of polytrauma patients in an international comparison]. Unfallchirurg. 1999; 102(2):80-91. DOI: 10.1007/s001130050378. View

4.
Bone R . Let's agree on terminology: definitions of sepsis. Crit Care Med. 1991; 19(7):973-6. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199107000-00024. View

5.
Sauaia A, Moore F, Moore E, Moser K, Brennan R, Read R . Epidemiology of trauma deaths: a reassessment. J Trauma. 1995; 38(2):185-93. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199502000-00006. View