» Articles » PMID: 25673835

Reversal Learning and Dopamine: a Bayesian Perspective

Overview
Journal J Neurosci
Specialty Neurology
Date 2015 Feb 13
PMID 25673835
Citations 76
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Reversal learning has been studied as the process of learning to inhibit previously rewarded actions. Deficits in reversal learning have been seen after manipulations of dopamine and lesions of the orbitofrontal cortex. However, reversal learning is often studied in animals that have limited experience with reversals. As such, the animals are learning that reversals occur during data collection. We have examined a task regime in which monkeys have extensive experience with reversals and stable behavioral performance on a probabilistic two-arm bandit reversal learning task. We developed a Bayesian analysis approach to examine the effects of manipulations of dopamine on reversal performance in this regime. We find that the analysis can clarify the strategy of the animal. Specifically, at reversal, the monkeys switch quickly from choosing one stimulus to choosing the other, as opposed to gradually transitioning, which might be expected if they were using a naive reinforcement learning (RL) update of value. Furthermore, we found that administration of haloperidol affects the way the animals integrate prior knowledge into their choice behavior. Animals had a stronger prior on where reversals would occur on haloperidol than on levodopa (l-DOPA) or placebo. This strong prior was appropriate, because the animals had extensive experience with reversals occurring in the middle of the block. Overall, we find that Bayesian dissection of the behavior clarifies the strategy of the animals and reveals an effect of haloperidol on integration of prior information with evidence in favor of a choice reversal.

Citing Articles

Effects of chronic stress on cognitive function - From neurobiology to intervention.

Girotti M, Bulin S, Carreno F Neurobiol Stress. 2024; 33:100670.

PMID: 39295772 PMC: 11407068. DOI: 10.1016/j.ynstr.2024.100670.


Positive affect modulates memory by regulating the influence of reward prediction errors.

Qasim S, Deswal A, Saez I, Gu X Commun Psychol. 2024; 2(1):52.

PMID: 39242805 PMC: 11332028. DOI: 10.1038/s44271-024-00106-4.


A vast space of compact strategies for effective decisions.

Ma T, Hermundstad A Sci Adv. 2024; 10(25):eadj4064.

PMID: 38905348 PMC: 11192086. DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.adj4064.


Medial prefrontal cortex suppresses reward-seeking behavior with risk of punishment by reducing sensitivity to reward.

Nishio M, Kondo M, Yoshida E, Matsuzaki M Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1412509.

PMID: 38903603 PMC: 11188571. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1412509.


Lesions to the mediodorsal thalamus, but not orbitofrontal cortex, enhance volatility beliefs linked to paranoia.

Suthaharan P, Thompson S, Rossi-Goldthorpe R, Rudebeck P, Walton M, Chakraborty S Cell Rep. 2024; 43(6):114355.

PMID: 38870010 PMC: 11231991. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114355.


References
1.
Frank M, OReilly R . A mechanistic account of striatal dopamine function in human cognition: psychopharmacological studies with cabergoline and haloperidol. Behav Neurosci. 2006; 120(3):497-517. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7044.120.3.497. View

2.
Mehta M, Swainson R, Ogilvie A, Sahakian J, Robbins T . Improved short-term spatial memory but impaired reversal learning following the dopamine D(2) agonist bromocriptine in human volunteers. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2002; 159(1):10-20. DOI: 10.1007/s002130100851. View

3.
Mitz A . A liquid-delivery device that provides precise reward control for neurophysiological and behavioral experiments. J Neurosci Methods. 2005; 148(1):19-25. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2005.07.012. View

4.
Salamone J, Correa M . The mysterious motivational functions of mesolimbic dopamine. Neuron. 2012; 76(3):470-85. PMC: 4450094. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2012.10.021. View

5.
Dias R, Robbins T, Roberts A . Primate analogue of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: effects of excitotoxic lesions of the prefrontal cortex in the marmoset. Behav Neurosci. 1996; 110(5):872-86. DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.110.5.872. View