» Articles » PMID: 25672617

Why Do People Participate in Epidemiological Research?

Overview
Journal J Bioeth Inq
Publisher Springer
Specialty Medical Ethics
Date 2015 Feb 13
PMID 25672617
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Many assumptions are made about public willingness to participate in epidemiological research, yet few empirical studies have been conducted to ascertain whether such assumptions are correct. Our qualitative study of the public and of expert stakeholders leads us to suggest that people are generally prepared to participate in epidemiological research, particularly if it is conducted by a trusted public institution such as a government health department, charity, or university. However, there is widespread community distrust of research conducted or sponsored by pharmaceutical companies. Individuals are prompted to take part if the study concerns an illness they or a family member or friend have personally experienced or if they believe the research will confer a widespread public benefit. Preferences vary about the mode of contact for the research to be conducted. Willingness to participate in telephone surveys has decreased in recent years, and this may be a consequence of an increase in calls to homes by telemarketers and market researchers. Participants also stressed the importance of knowing where their names and contact details were sourced and suggested that this information be available to prospective study participants as a matter of course in the first approach or letter. We provide valuable information to epidemiologists in designing studies.

Citing Articles

Establishing a Collaborative Genomic Repository for Adult Burn Survivors: A Burn Model System Feasibility Study.

Sibbett S, Oh J, Carrougher G, Muffley L, Ashford N, Pacleb M Eur Burn J. 2024; 5(4):389-398.

PMID: 39727910 PMC: 11586972. DOI: 10.3390/ebj5040034.


Public attitudes towards personal health data sharing in long-term epidemiological research: a Citizen Science approach in the KORA study.

Ruckert-Eheberg I, Heier M, Simon M, Kraus M, Peters A, Linkohr B BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2317.

PMID: 39187842 PMC: 11348671. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19730-0.


A multiple sclerosis lifestyle behavior online course: Qualitative analysis of participants' motivations, expectations and experiences.

Neate S, Bevens W, Jelinek P, Gray K, Weiland T, Nag N Front Public Health. 2022; 10:1022185.

PMID: 36568793 PMC: 9768550. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1022185.


Why Vaccinate Against COVID-19? A Population-Based Survey in Switzerland.

Fadda M, Camerini A, Fiordelli M, Corna L, Levati S, Amati R Int J Public Health. 2022; 67:1604226.

PMID: 35418817 PMC: 8997237. DOI: 10.3389/ijph.2022.1604226.


Reasons for participation in a child development study: Are cases with developmental diagnoses different from controls?.

Bradley C, Tapia A, DiGuiseppi C, Kepner M, Kloetzer J, Schieve L Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2022; 36(3):435-445.

PMID: 35107836 PMC: 9169212. DOI: 10.1111/ppe.12861.


References
1.
Plummer P, Jackson S, Konarski J, Mahanna E, Dunmore C, Regan G . Making epidemiologic studies responsive to the needs of participants and communities: the Carolina Breast Cancer Study experience. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2002; 39(2-3):96-101. DOI: 10.1002/em.10045. View

2.
Green J, Willis K, Hughes E, Small R, Welch N, Gibbs L . Generating best evidence from qualitative research: the role of data analysis. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2007; 31(6):545-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2007.00141.x. View

3.
McSweeney J, Pettey C, Fischer E, Spellman A . Going the distance: overcoming challenges in recruitment and retention of Black and White women in multisite, longitudinal study of predictors of coronary heart disease. Res Gerontol Nurs. 2010; 2(4):256-64. PMC: 2854651. DOI: 10.3928/19404921-20090803-01. View

4.
Morris N, Schneider M . Volunteer research subjects' experience of participation in research on a novel diagnostic technology for breast cancer. Qual Health Res. 2009; 20(1):81-92. DOI: 10.1177/1049732309355592. View

5.
Robling M, Hood K, Houston H, Pill R, Fay J, Evans H . Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics. 2004; 30(1):104-9. PMC: 1757117. DOI: 10.1136/jme.2003.005157. View