» Articles » PMID: 25666749

Validation of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire Classification Coding System Using Accelerometer Assessment Among Breast Cancer Survivors

Overview
Journal J Cancer Surviv
Specialty Oncology
Date 2015 Feb 11
PMID 25666749
Citations 85
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this research was to provide convergent validity evidence for the use of the Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire (GSLTPAQ) to classify breast cancer survivors into active and insufficiently active categories.

Methods: Data were collected among a sample of breast cancer survivors (N = 199; mean age = 55 years) to examine the association between physical activity assessed with a GT3X triaxial accelerometer and the use of the GSLTPAQ's coding system recently proposed by Godin (2011). Participants self-reported moderate and vigorous physical activity (MVPA) performed in a typical week on the GSLTPAQ and those with MVPA leisure score index ≥ 24 were classified as active.

Results: ANCOVA revealed that the adjusted mean [95% CI] number of recorded MVPA minutes was higher for respondents classified as active (145.54 [127.26; 163.83]) compared to respondents classified as insufficiently active (86.99 [74.04; 99.94]). The GSLTPAQ and accelerometer classified 33.8 and 27.2% of participants as active, respectively (agreement = 70.8%). Sensitivity and specificity values were 75.3 and 58.5%, respectively.

Conclusion: The GSLTPAQ can be used to classify cancer survivors into active and insufficiently active categories in reference to cancer survivors' physical activity guidelines. However, it has greater capacity to correctly identify insufficiently active respondents.

Implications For Cancer Survivors: The use of the GSLTPAQ's classification coding in oncology research could improve the quality of physical activity recommendations and interventions handed out to cancer survivors.

Citing Articles

Exercise and cardiovascular health among breast cancer survivors: a scoping review of current observational evidence.

Wilson O, Wojcik K, Cohen C, Kamil D, Butera G, Matthews C Cardiooncology. 2025; 11(1):24.

PMID: 40012001 PMC: 11863919. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-025-00310-z.


Validity and Reliability of the Spanish Version of Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire in Prostate Cancer Patients.

Martin Nunez J, Valenza M, Heredia Ciuro A, Calvache Mateo A, Navas Otero A, Blasco Valls P Healthcare (Basel). 2025; 13(2.

PMID: 39857181 PMC: 11765051. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare13020154.


Cardiorespiratory fitness, cardiac morphology and function, and cardiovascular risk factors in long-term breast cancer survivors compared with non-cancer controls.

Saeter M, Johansen S, Reinertsen K, Thorsen L, Haugaa K, Nilsen T Cardiooncology. 2025; 11(1):1.

PMID: 39755716 PMC: 11699684. DOI: 10.1186/s40959-024-00296-0.


Metastatic breast cancer patients' preferences for exercise programs: a latent class analysis using data from a survey in five European countries.

Sweegers M, Depenbusch J, Aaronson N, Hiensch A, Wengstrom Y, Backman M Support Care Cancer. 2024; 33(1):39.

PMID: 39694910 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-024-09068-z.


Meeting Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines and Associations With Physical Fitness in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Baseline Results of the Multicentre INTERVAL-GAP4 Trial.

Umlauff L, Kenfield S, Newton R, Hart N, Saad F, Courneya K Cancer Med. 2024; 13(23):e70261.

PMID: 39632499 PMC: 11617593. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70261.


References
1.
Hendelman D, Miller K, Baggett C, Debold E, Freedson P . Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000; 32(9 Suppl):S442-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005768-200009001-00002. View

2.
Schatzkin A, Subar A, Moore S, Park Y, Potischman N, Thompson F . Observational epidemiologic studies of nutrition and cancer: the next generation (with better observation). Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2009; 18(4):1026-32. PMC: 2688809. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-08-1129. View

3.
Ainsworth B, Caspersen C, Matthews C, Masse L, Baranowski T, Zhu W . Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 9 Suppl 1:S76-84. PMC: 3544158. DOI: 10.1123/jpah.9.s1.s76. View

4.
Rock C, Doyle C, Demark-Wahnefried W, Meyerhardt J, Courneya K, Schwartz A . Nutrition and physical activity guidelines for cancer survivors. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012; 62(4):243-74. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21142. View

5.
Helmerhorst H, Brage S, Warren J, Besson H, Ekelund U . A systematic review of reliability and objective criterion-related validity of physical activity questionnaires. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012; 9:103. PMC: 3492158. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-9-103. View