» Articles » PMID: 25662893

Trends in Use of Marijuana and Attitudes Toward Marijuana Among Youth Before and After Decriminalization: the Case of California 2007-2013

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2015 Feb 10
PMID 25662893
Citations 54
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: This analysis examines decriminalization as a risk factor for future increases in youth marijuana acceptance and use. Specifically, we examine marijuana-related behaviors and attitudes of 8th, 10th, and 12th graders in California as compared to other U.S. states during the years before and after California passed legislation in 2010 to decriminalize marijuana.

Methods: Data come from Monitoring the Future, an annual, nationally representative survey of 8th, 10th, and 12th grade students.

Results: In 2012 and afterwards California 12th graders as compared to their peers in other states became (a) 25% more likely to have used marijuana in the past 30 days, (b) 20% less likely to perceive regular marijuana use as a great health risk, (c) 20% less likely to strongly disapprove of regular marijuana use, and (d) about 60% more likely to expect to be using marijuana five years in the future. Analysis of 10th graders raises the possibility that the findings among 12th graders may reflect a cohort effect that was set into place two years earlier.

Conclusion: These results provide empirical evidence to support concerns that decriminalization may be a risk factor for future increases in youth marijuana use and acceptance.

Citing Articles

Regulatory sandboxes as an innovative platform for testing Cannabis edibles in Germany.

Al Hallaj H, Barakat Z J Cannabis Res. 2025; 7(1):14.

PMID: 40025611 PMC: 11871622. DOI: 10.1186/s42238-025-00263-1.


Marijuana and e-cigarette use in a US national sample of 8th and 10th grade never-smokers of conventional cigarettes.

Owotomo O, Maslowsky J J Appl Res Child. 2023; 8(2).

PMID: 38078149 PMC: 10704384. DOI: 10.58464/2155-5834.1333.


Association of Racial Disparity of Cannabis Possession Arrests Among Adults and Youths With Statewide Cannabis Decriminalization and Legalization.

Sheehan B, Grucza R, Plunk A JAMA Health Forum. 2022; 2(10):e213435.

PMID: 35977162 PMC: 8727041. DOI: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2021.3435.


Electronic health record data may lead to underestimates of cannabis use-Especially among older populations.

Palamar J, Le A J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022; 70(6):1657-1660.

PMID: 35234290 PMC: 9177566. DOI: 10.1111/jgs.17720.


A systematic review of neuroimaging and acute cannabis exposure in age-of-risk for psychosis.

Cupo L, Plitman E, Guma E, Chakravarty M Transl Psychiatry. 2021; 11(1):217.

PMID: 33850098 PMC: 8044224. DOI: 10.1038/s41398-021-01295-w.


References
1.
Pacula R . Does increasing the beer tax reduce marijuana consumption?. J Health Econ. 1998; 17(5):557-85. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6296(97)00039-8. View

2.
Single E, Christie P, Ali R . The impact of cannabis decriminalisation in Australia and the United States. J Public Health Policy. 2000; 21(2):157-86. View

3.
MacCoun R, Reuter P . Evaluating alternative cannabis regimes. Br J Psychiatry. 2001; 178:123-8. DOI: 10.1192/bjp.178.2.123. View

4.
Lynskey M, Hall W . The effects of adolescent cannabis use on educational attainment: a review. Addiction. 2001; 95(11):1621-30. DOI: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.951116213.x. View

5.
Lynskey M, Heath A, Bucholz K, Slutske W, Madden P, Nelson E . Escalation of drug use in early-onset cannabis users vs co-twin controls. JAMA. 2003; 289(4):427-33. DOI: 10.1001/jama.289.4.427. View