» Articles » PMID: 25653564

Bioavailability of Everolimus Administered As a Single 5 Mg Tablet Versus Five 1 Mg Tablets: a Randomized, Open-label, Two-way Crossover Study of Healthy Volunteers

Overview
Journal Clin Pharmacol
Publisher Dove Medical Press
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2015 Feb 6
PMID 25653564
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor everolimus has a well-established pharmacokinetics profile. We conducted a randomized, single-center, open-label, two-sequence, two-period crossover study of healthy volunteers to assess the relative bioavailability of everolimus administered as one 5 mg tablet or five 1 mg tablets.

Methods: Subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive everolimus dosed as one 5 mg tablet or as five 1 mg tablets on day 1, followed by a washout period on days 8-14 and then the opposite formulation on day 15. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetic evaluation was performed at prespecified time points, with 17 samples taken for each treatment period. Primary variables for evaluation of relative bioavailability were area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity (AUCinf) and maximum blood concentration (Cmax). Safety was assessed by reporting the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results: Twenty-two participants received everolimus as one 5 mg tablet followed by five 1 mg tablets (n=11) or the opposite sequence (n=11). The Cmax of five 1 mg tablets was 48% higher than that of one 5 mg tablet (geometric mean ratio, 1.48; 90% confidence interval [CI], 1.35-1.62). AUCinf was similar (geometric mean ratio, 1.08; 90% CI, 1.02-1.16), as were the extent of absorption and the distribution and elimination kinetics. AEs, all grade 1 or 2, were observed in 54.5% of subjects.

Conclusion: Although the extent of absorption was similar, the Cmax of five 1 mg tablets was higher than that of one 5 mg tablet, suggesting these formulations lead to different peak blood concentrations and are not interchangeable at the dose tested.

Citing Articles

Small-Molecule Compounds Boost CAR-T Cell Therapy in Hematological Malignancies.

Cao X, Jin X, Zhang X, Utsav P, Zhang Y, Guo R Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023; 24(3):184-211.

PMID: 36701037 PMC: 9992085. DOI: 10.1007/s11864-023-01049-4.


Novel strategies for the mitigation of cytokine release syndrome induced by T cell engaging therapies with a focus on the use of kinase inhibitors.

Leclercq G, Steinhoff N, Haegel H, De Marco D, Bacac M, Klein C Oncoimmunology. 2022; 11(1):2083479.

PMID: 35694193 PMC: 9176235. DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2022.2083479.


JAK and mTOR inhibitors prevent cytokine release while retaining T cell bispecific antibody in vivo efficacy.

Leclercq G, Haegel H, Toso A, Zimmermann T, Green L, Steinhoff N J Immunother Cancer. 2022; 10(1).

PMID: 35064010 PMC: 8785208. DOI: 10.1136/jitc-2021-003766.


Dose-Dependent Acute Effects of Everolimus Administration on Immunological, Neuroendocrine and Psychological Parameters in Healthy Men.

Horbelt T, Kahl A, Kolbe F, Hetze S, Wilde B, Witzke O Clin Transl Sci. 2020; 13(6):1251-1259.

PMID: 32475067 PMC: 7719391. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12812.


Pivotal Considerations for Optimal Deployment of Healthy Volunteers in Oncology Drug Development.

Ahmed M, Patel C, Drezner N, Helms W, Tan W, Stypinski D Clin Transl Sci. 2019; 13(1):31-40.

PMID: 31674150 PMC: 6951451. DOI: 10.1111/cts.12703.


References
1.
Lebwohl D, Anak O, Sahmoud T, Klimovsky J, Elmroth I, Haas T . Development of everolimus, a novel oral mTOR inhibitor, across a spectrum of diseases. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2013; 1291:14-32. DOI: 10.1111/nyas.12122. View

2.
Dancey J . mTOR signaling and drug development in cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2010; 7(4):209-19. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2010.21. View

3.
Ravaud A, Urva S, Grosch K, Cheung W, Anak O, Sellami D . Relationship between everolimus exposure and safety and efficacy: meta-analysis of clinical trials in oncology. Eur J Cancer. 2013; 50(3):486-95. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.11.022. View

4.
ODonnell A, Faivre S, Burris 3rd H, Rea D, Papadimitrakopoulou V, Shand N . Phase I pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of the oral mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor everolimus in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26(10):1588-95. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.14.0988. View

5.
Sankhala K, Mita A, Kelly K, Mahalingam D, Giles F, Mita M . The emerging safety profile of mTOR inhibitors, a novel class of anticancer agents. Target Oncol. 2009; 4(2):135-42. DOI: 10.1007/s11523-009-0107-z. View