» Articles » PMID: 25652801

Can Certified Health Professionals Treat Obesity in a Community-based Programme? A Quasi-experimental Study

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Feb 6
PMID 25652801
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To test the effectiveness of a non-pharmaceutical programme for obese participants in a rural Eastern Canadian Province using certified health professionals.

Design: A prospective quasi-experimental design with repeated premeasure and postmeasure.

Participants: 146 participants with obesity (body mass index >30 kg/m(2)) from rural and urban communities in an Eastern Canadian Province were divided into four groups.

Intervention: A 6-month intensive active community-based lifestyle intervention (InI) delivered by Certified Exercise Physiologists, Certified Personal Trainers and Registered Dietitians, followed by 6 months of self-management. A second intervention (InII) was nested in InI and consisted of group-mediated cognitive-behavioral intervention (GMCBI) delivered by an exercise psychologist to two of the four InI groups.

Outcomes: (1) Improving health outcomes among the participants' preactive and postactive 6-month intervention and self-management period, (2) Documenting the impact of InII (GMCBI) and location of the intervention (urban vs rural).

Results: The 6-month active InI significantly improved cardiovascular health for participants who completed the intervention. InII (GMCBI) significantly lowered the attrition rate among the participants. The self-management period was challenging for the participants and they did not make further gains; however, most were able to maintain the gains achieved during the active intervention. The location of the intervention, urban or rural, had little impact on outcomes.

Conclusions: A community-based programme utilising healthcare professionals other than physicians to treat obese patients was effective based on premeasure and postmeasure. During the self-management phase, the participants were able to maintain the gains. Psychological support is essential to participant retention.

Citing Articles

Physical activity promotion in rural health care settings: A rapid realist review.

Pelletier C, Cornish K, Amyot T, Pousette A, Fox G, Snadden D Prev Med Rep. 2022; 29:101905.

PMID: 35879935 PMC: 9307466. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2022.101905.


Evaluation of a multiprofessional, nonsurgical obesity treatment program: which parameters indicated life style changes and weight loss?.

Pjanic , Muller R, Laimer M, Hagenbuch N, Laederach K, Stanga Z J Eat Disord. 2017; 5:14.

PMID: 28515933 PMC: 5430604. DOI: 10.1186/s40337-017-0144-4.


Improving Obesity Prevention and Management in Primary Care in Canada.

Campbell-Scherer D, Sharma A Curr Obes Rep. 2016; 5(3):327-32.

PMID: 27342445 DOI: 10.1007/s13679-016-0222-y.

References
1.
Petrella R, Lattanzio C, Shapiro S, Overend T . Improving aerobic fitness in older adults: effects of a physician-based exercise counseling and prescription program. Can Fam Physician. 2010; 56(5):e191-200. PMC: 2868630. View

2.
Witham M, Avenell A . Interventions to achieve long-term weight loss in obese older people: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing. 2010; 39(2):176-84. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afp251. View

3.
Marshall S, Biddle S . The transtheoretical model of behavior change: a meta-analysis of applications to physical activity and exercise. Ann Behav Med. 2002; 23(4):229-46. DOI: 10.1207/S15324796ABM2304_2. View

4.
Cramp A, Brawley L . Moms in motion: a group-mediated cognitive-behavioral physical activity intervention. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3:23. PMC: 1564034. DOI: 10.1186/1479-5868-3-23. View

5.
Hajizadeh M, Campbell M, Sarma S . Socioeconomic inequalities in adult obesity risk in Canada: trends and decomposition analyses. Eur J Health Econ. 2013; 15(2):203-21. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-013-0469-0. View