» Articles » PMID: 25652239

Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of Jean Rives Technique Versus Laparoscopic TEP Repair for Primary Inguinal Hernia: 10-year Follow-up

Overview
Journal Hernia
Publisher Springer
Date 2015 Feb 6
PMID 25652239
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The purpose of the present randomized trial was to compare the Jean Rives (JR) technique and the laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair for the treatment of primary inguinal hernias with respect to operating time, hospital stay, sick leave, chronic pain and recurrences after a follow-up of 10 years.

Methods: 110 patients with primary inguinal hernia were randomized to either a JR repair (53 patients) or to a laparoscopic (TEP) repair (57 patients). All the interventions were exclusively realized by two experienced surgeons. Follow-up examinations were performed after 1, 6 months, 1, 5 and 10 years.

Results: Both groups were identical concerning age and hernia type, which were type II and type IIIa according to Nyhus classification. No significant difference was found concerning hospital stay, chronic pain and recurrences. The operating time was significantly lower in JR group, whereas the sick leave was significantly in favor of TEP group.

Conclusion: Jean Rives technique is a relatively easy technique to perform, requires shorter operating time when compared to laparoscopic TEP technique. JR technique should be taken into consideration while planning surgical treatment of inguinal hernia.

Citing Articles

Varying convalescence recommendations after inguinal hernia repair: a systematic scoping review.

Harmankaya S, Oberg S, Rosenberg J Hernia. 2022; 26(4):1009-1021.

PMID: 35768670 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-022-02629-3.


[Inguinal and femoral hernia surgery : Open mesh procedure. Video article].

Dietz U, Germer C, Wiegering A Chirurg. 2016; 87(11):938-947.

PMID: 27770141 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-016-0294-y.


How Long Do We Need to Follow-Up Our Hernia Patients to Find the Real Recurrence Rate?.

Kockerling F, Koch A, Lorenz R, Schug-Pass C, Stechemesser B, Reinpold W Front Surg. 2015; 2:24.

PMID: 26137464 PMC: 4468742. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2015.00024.

References
1.
Sajid M, Craciunas L, Singh K, Sains P, Baig M . Open transinguinal preperitoneal mesh repair of inguinal hernia: a targeted systematic review and meta-analysis of published randomized controlled trials. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf). 2014; 1(2):127-37. PMC: 3938008. DOI: 10.1093/gastro/got002. View

2.
Forte A, DUrso A, Palumbo P, Lo Storto G, Gallinaro L, Bezzi M . Inguinal hernioplasty: the gold standard of hernia repair. Hernia. 2003; 7(1):35-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10029-002-0095-8. View

3.
Paganini A, Lezoche E, Carle F, Carlei F, Favretti F, Feliciotti F . A randomized, controlled, clinical study of laparoscopic vs open tension-free inguinal hernia repair. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12(7):979-86. DOI: 10.1007/s004649900760. View

4.
Roth J, Johnson J, Hazey J, Pofahl W . Current laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair. Curr Surg. 2004; 61(1):53-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0149-7944(03)00154-5. View

5.
WANTZ G . [Technique of properitoneal hernioplasty. Unilateral reinforcement of the visceral sac with Mersilene giant prosthesis]. Chirurgie. 1993; 119(6-7):321-6. View