» Articles » PMID: 25650114

Prevalence, Species Identification and Genotyping Cryptosporidium from Livestock and Deer in a Catchment in the Cairngorms with a History of a Contaminated Public Water Supply

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Feb 5
PMID 25650114
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The apicomplexan parasite Cryptosporidium represents a threat to water quality and public health. An important zoonotic species involved in human cryptosporidiosis from contaminated water is Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), the main reservoirs of which are known to be farm livestock particularly neonatal calves, although adult cattle, sheep, lambs and wildlife are also known to contribute to catchment loading of C. parvum. This study aimed to establish Cryptosporidium prevalence, species and genotype in livestock, deer and water in a catchment with a history of Cryptosporidium contamination in the public water supply.

Methods: A novel method of processing adult ruminant faecal sample was used to concentrate oocysts, followed by a nested species specific multiplex (nssm) PCR, targeting the 18S rRNA gene, to speciate Cryptosporidium. A multilocus fragment typing (MLFT) tool was used, in addition to GP60 sequencing, to genotype C. parvum positive samples.

Results: A very high prevalence of Cryptosporidium was detected, with speciation identifying a predominance of C. parvum in livestock, deer and water samples. Four GP60 subtypes were detected within C. parvum with the majority IIaA15G2R1 which was detected in all host species and on all farms. Multilocus fragment typing further differentiated these into 6 highly related multilocus genotypes.

Conclusion: The high prevalence of Cryptosporidium detected was possibly due to a combination of the newly developed sample processing technique used and a reflection of the high rates of the parasite present in this catchment. The predominance of C. parvum in livestock and deer sampled in this study suggested that they represented a significant risk to water quality and public health. Genotyping results suggested that the parasite is being transmitted locally within the study area, possibly via free-roaming sheep and deer. Further studies are needed to verify particular host associations with subtypes/MLGs. Land and livestock management solutions to reduce Cryptosporidium on farm and in the catchment are planned with the aim to improve animal health and production as well as water quality and public health.

Citing Articles

Gut Barrier Dysfunction and Microbiota Variations in Cryptosporidiosis: A Comprehensive Review.

Ali M, Xu C, Wang M, Hina Q, Ji Y, Anwar S Vet Sci. 2025; 12(2).

PMID: 40005845 PMC: 11861801. DOI: 10.3390/vetsci12020085.


Molecular analysis of cryptosporidiosis on cattle farms in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands (Spain).

Del Rio M, Martin S, Quilez J, Vergara-Castiblanco C, Molina J, Ferrer O Int J Vet Sci Med. 2025; 13(1):1-14.

PMID: 39935488 PMC: 11812112. DOI: 10.1080/23144599.2025.2460923.


Nanoparticle Lysis of Oocysts.

Vaidya A, Bankier C, Johnston H, Bridle H Methods Protoc. 2024; 7(5).

PMID: 39311367 PMC: 11417895. DOI: 10.3390/mps7050066.


Anti-Cryptosporidial Drug-Discovery Challenges and Existing Therapeutic Avenues: A "One-Health" Concern.

Ali M, Xu C, Nawaz S, Ahmed A, Hina Q, Li K Life (Basel). 2024; 14(1).

PMID: 38255695 PMC: 10820218. DOI: 10.3390/life14010080.


Differences in virulence and oocyst shedding profiles in lambs experimentally infected with different isolates of .

Bartley P, Thomson S, Jonsson N, Taroda A, Elisabeth A, Katzer F Curr Res Parasitol Vector Borne Dis. 2023; 4:100127.

PMID: 37456556 PMC: 10344821. DOI: 10.1016/j.crpvbd.2023.100127.


References
1.
Atwill E, Pereira M . Lack of detectable shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts by periparturient dairy cattle. J Parasitol. 2004; 89(6):1234-6. DOI: 10.1645/GE-3192RN. View

2.
Robinson G, Chalmers R . Assessment of polymorphic genetic markers for multi-locus typing of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis. Exp Parasitol. 2012; 132(2):200-15. DOI: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.06.016. View

3.
Meinhardt P, Casemore D, Miller K . Epidemiologic aspects of human cryptosporidiosis and the role of waterborne transmission. Epidemiol Rev. 1996; 18(2):118-36. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.epirev.a017920. View

4.
Atwill E, Johnson E, Klingborg D, Veserat G, Markegard G, Jensen W . Age, geographic, and temporal distribution of fecal shedding of Cryptosporidium parvum oocysts in cow-calf herds. Am J Vet Res. 1999; 60(4):420-5. View

5.
Hunter P, Thompson R . The zoonotic transmission of Giardia and Cryptosporidium. Int J Parasitol. 2005; 35(11-12):1181-90. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpara.2005.07.009. View