[Triage Protocols for Mass Casualty Incidents : An Overview 30 Years After START]

Overview

Journal Unfallchirurg

Date 2015 Feb 5

PMID 25648872

Citations 8

Authors

S Streckbein

T Kohlmann

J Luxen

T Birkholz

S Pruckner

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Since the publication of the first mass casualty triage protocol approximately 30 years ago, numerous adaptions and alternatives have been introduced and are currently in use throughout the world. This variety may represent a challenge for the cooperation between emergency medical providers and the interoperability of emergency medical services often required during mass casualty incidents. To enhance cooperation and interoperability a standardization of triage protocols is required.

Objectives: This survey was carried out in order to identify and characterize published triage protocols on national and international levels. Furthermore, evidence for validation of the identified triage algorithms was discussed and recommendations for standardization of triage protocols are given.

Material And Methods: In a systematic literature search 59 relevant articles were identified and evaluated with respect to the given objectives.

Results: A total of 12 triage concepts were identified and characterized which are categorized according to the basic principle.

Discussion: The endpoints of the studies, the chosen observation units and the mode of data collection were discussed with respect to their impact on validation. Furthermore, the impact of the degree and dynamics of system capacity overload, which are pathognomonic for mass casualty incidents, were discussed.

Conclusion: There is not sufficient evidence to declare one of the triage protocols superior in all aspects to the others and no triage protocol has been implemented on a comprehensive level in Germany. In order to initialize a national or regional convergence process towards an interoperability of emergency medical services, the model uniform core criteria for mass casualty triage approach has been identified as being appropriate.

Citing Articles

Management of mass casualty incidents: a systematic review and clinical practice guideline update.

Suda A, Franke A, Hertwig M, Goossen K Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025; 51(1):5.

PMID: 39792184 PMC: 11723885. DOI: 10.1007/s00068-024-02727-0.

Validation of secondary triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents : A simulation-based study-English version.

Heller A, Neidel T, Klotz P, Solarek A, Kowalzik B, Juncken K Anaesthesiologie. 2023; 72(Suppl 1):1-9.

PMID: 37823925 PMC: 10692258. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-023-01292-2.

[Validation of secondary triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents-A simulation-based study-German version].

Heller A, Neidel T, Klotz P, Solarek A, Kowalzik B, Juncken K Anaesthesiologie. 2023; 72(7):467-476.

PMID: 37318526 PMC: 10322965. DOI: 10.1007/s00101-023-01291-3.

[Cardiac arrest under special circumstances].

Lott C, Truhlar A, Alfonzo A, Barelli A, Gonzalez-Salvado V, Hinkelbein J Notf Rett Med. 2021; 24(4):447-523.

PMID: 34127910 PMC: 8190767. DOI: 10.1007/s10049-021-00891-z.

Primary mass casualty incident triage: evidence for the benefit of yearly brief re-training from a simulation study.

Dittmar M, Wolf P, Bigalke M, Graf B, Birkholz T Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26(1):35.

PMID: 29703219 PMC: 5923025. DOI: 10.1186/s13049-018-0501-6.

References

Rutledge R, Osler T, Emery S . The end of the Injury Severity Score (ISS) and the Trauma and Injury Severity Score (TRISS): ICISS, an International Classification of Diseases, ninth revision-based prediction tool, outperforms both ISS and TRISS as predictors of trauma patient.... J Trauma. 1998; 44(1):41-9. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-199801000-00003. View

Hupert N, Hollingsworth E, Xiong W . Is overtriage associated with increased mortality? Insights from a simulation model of mass casualty trauma care. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008; 1(1 Suppl):S14-24. DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e31814cfa54. View

Husum H, Gilbert M, Wisborg T, Heng Y, Murad M . Respiratory rate as a prehospital triage tool in rural trauma. J Trauma. 2003; 55(3):466-70. DOI: 10.1097/01.TA.0000044634.98189.DE. View

Baxt W, Jones G, Fortlage D . The trauma triage rule: a new, resource-based approach to the prehospital identification of major trauma victims. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19(12):1401-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(05)82608-3. View

Kilner T, Brace S, Cooke M, Stallard N, Bleetman A, Perkins G . In 'big bang' major incidents do triage tools accurately predict clinical priority?: a systematic review of the literature. Injury. 2010; 42(5):460-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2010.11.005. View

Hirshberg A, Scott B, Granchi T, Wall Jr M, Mattox K, Stein M . How does casualty load affect trauma care in urban bombing incidents? A quantitative analysis. J Trauma. 2005; 58(4):686-93. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000159243.70507.86. View

Hirshberg A, Frykberg E, Mattox K, Stein M . Triage and trauma workload in mass casualty: a computer model. J Trauma. 2010; 69(5):1074-81. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181e50624. View

Jenkins J, McCarthy M, Sauer L, Green G, Stuart S, Thomas T . Mass-casualty triage: time for an evidence-based approach. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2008; 23(1):3-8. DOI: 10.1017/s1049023x00005471. View

Challen K, Walter D . Major incident triage: comparative validation using data from 7th July bombings. Injury. 2012; 44(5):629-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.06.026. View

10.

Kahn C, Schultz C, Miller K, Anderson C . Does START triage work? An outcomes assessment after a disaster. Ann Emerg Med. 2009; 54(3):424-30, 430.e1. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2008.12.035. View

11.

Champion H, Sacco W, Hunt T . Trauma severity scoring to predict mortality. World J Surg. 1983; 7(1):4-11. DOI: 10.1007/BF01655906. View

12.

Frykberg E . Medical management of disasters and mass casualties from terrorist bombings: how can we cope?. J Trauma. 2002; 53(2):201-12. DOI: 10.1097/00005373-200208000-00001. View

13.

Garner A, Lee A, Harrison K, Schultz C . Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms. Ann Emerg Med. 2001; 38(5):541-8. DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.119053. View

14.

. Model uniform core criteria for mass casualty triage. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011; 5(2):125-8. DOI: 10.1001/dmp.2011.41. View

15.

Cooke M, Brace S . Training for disaster. Resuscitation. 2010; 81(7):788-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.04.026. View

16.

Newgard C, Rudser K, Hedges J, Kerby J, Stiell I, Davis D . A critical assessment of the out-of-hospital trauma triage guidelines for physiologic abnormality. J Trauma. 2010; 68(2):452-62. PMC: 3785297. DOI: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181ae20c9. View

17.

Baker S, ONeill B, HADDON Jr W, Long W . The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187-96. View

18.

Brooke Lerner E, Schwartz R, Coule P, Weinstein E, Cone D, Hunt R . Mass casualty triage: an evaluation of the data and development of a proposed national guideline. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008; 2 Suppl 1:S25-34. DOI: 10.1097/DMP.0b013e318182194e. View

19.

Eastridge B, Butler F, Wade C, Holcomb J, Salinas J, Champion H . Field triage score (FTS) in battlefield casualties: validation of a novel triage technique in a combat environment. Am J Surg. 2010; 200(6):724-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.08.006. View

20.

Timbie J, Ringel J, Fox D, Pillemer F, Waxman D, Moore M . Systematic review of strategies to manage and allocate scarce resources during mass casualty events. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 61(6):677-689.e101. PMC: 6997611. DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2013.02.005. View