» Articles » PMID: 25646789

A Novel Mini-DNA Barcoding Assay to Identify Processed Fins from Internationally Protected Shark Species

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2015 Feb 4
PMID 25646789
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

There is a growing need to identify shark products in trade, in part due to the recent listing of five commercially important species on the Appendices of the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (CITES; porbeagle, Lamna nasus, oceanic whitetip, Carcharhinus longimanus scalloped hammerhead, Sphyrna lewini, smooth hammerhead, S. zygaena and great hammerhead S. mokarran) in addition to three species listed in the early part of this century (whale, Rhincodon typus, basking, Cetorhinus maximus, and white, Carcharodon carcharias). Shark fins are traded internationally to supply the Asian dried seafood market, in which they are used to make the luxury dish shark fin soup. Shark fins usually enter international trade with their skin still intact and can be identified using morphological characters or standard DNA-barcoding approaches. Once they reach Asia and are traded in this region the skin is removed and they are treated with chemicals that eliminate many key diagnostic characters and degrade their DNA ("processed fins"). Here, we present a validated mini-barcode assay based on partial sequences of the cytochrome oxidase I gene that can reliably identify the processed fins of seven of the eight CITES listed shark species. We also demonstrate that the assay can even frequently identify the species or genus of origin of shark fin soup (31 out of 50 samples).

Citing Articles

Genetic identification of three CITES-listed sharks using a paper-based Lab-on-a-Chip (LOC).

Tiktak G, Gabb A, Brandt M, Diz F, Bravo-Vasquez K, Penaherrera-Palma C PLoS One. 2024; 19(4):e0300383.

PMID: 38574082 PMC: 10994358. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0300383.


DNA barcoding continues to identify endangered species of shark sold as food in a globally significant shark fin trade hub.

Selena Shen K, Cheow J, Cheung A, Koh R, Koh Xiao Mun A, Lee Y PeerJ. 2024; 12:e16647.

PMID: 38188178 PMC: 10771092. DOI: 10.7717/peerj.16647.


Endangered shark species traded as "cação" in São Paulo during the COVID-19 lockdown: DNA-barcoding a snapshot of products.

Zuccolo V, Rego F, Hughes E, Griffiths A Mol Biol Rep. 2023; 50(12):9985-9992.

PMID: 37898957 PMC: 10676306. DOI: 10.1007/s11033-023-08876-6.


Universal closed-tube barcoding for monitoring the shark and ray trade in megadiverse conservation hotspots.

Prasetyo A, Cusa M, Murray J, Agung F, Muttaqin E, Mariani S iScience. 2023; 26(7):107065.

PMID: 37389182 PMC: 10300358. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107065.


Age group DNA methylation differences in lemon sharks (): Implications for future age estimation tools.

Beal A, Hackerott S, Feldheim K, Gruber S, Eirin-Lopez J Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(8):e9226.

PMID: 36052296 PMC: 9425014. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.9226.


References
1.
Wong E, Shivji M, Hanner R . Identifying sharks with DNA barcodes: assessing the utility of a nucleotide diagnostic approach. Mol Ecol Resour. 2011; 9 Suppl s1:243-56. DOI: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2009.02653.x. View

2.
Ferretti F, Worm B, Britten G, Heithaus M, Lotze H . Patterns and ecosystem consequences of shark declines in the ocean. Ecol Lett. 2010; 13(8):1055-71. DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01489.x. View

3.
Ward R, Zemlak T, Innes B, Last P, Hebert P . DNA barcoding Australia's fish species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2005; 360(1462):1847-57. PMC: 1609232. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1716. View

4.
Wesche P, Gaffney D, Keightley P . DNA sequence error rates in Genbank records estimated using the mouse genome as a reference. DNA Seq. 2004; 15(5-6):362-4. DOI: 10.1080/10425170400008972. View

5.
Dawnay N, Ogden R, McEwing R, Carvalho G, Thorpe R . Validation of the barcoding gene COI for use in forensic genetic species identification. Forensic Sci Int. 2007; 173(1):1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.09.013. View