Early Survival Prediction After Intra-arterial Therapies: a 3D Quantitative MRI Assessment of Tumour Response After TACE or Radioembolization of Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objectives: This study evaluated the predictive role of 1D, 2D and 3D quantitative, enhancement-based MRI regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following intra-arterial therapies (IAT).
Methods: This retrospective analysis included 29 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization and received MRI within 6 weeks after therapy. Tumour response was assessed using 1D and 2D criteria (such as European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines [EASL] and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]). In addition, a segmentation-based 3D quantification of overall (volumetric [v] RECIST) and enhancing lesion volume (quantitative [q] EASL) was performed on portal venous phase MRI. Accordingly, patients were classified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR).
Results: Only enhancement-based criteria identified patients as responders. EASL and mRECIST did not predict patient survival (P = 0.27 and P = 0.44, respectively). Using uni- and multivariate analysis, qEASL was identified as the sole predictor of patient survival (9.9 months for R, 6.9 months for NR; P = 0.038; HR 0.4).
Conclusion: The ability of qEASL to predict survival early after IAT provides evidence for potential advantages of 3D quantitative tumour analysis.
Key Points: • Volumetric assessment of colorectal liver metastases after intra-arterial therapy is feasible. • Early 3D quantitative tumour analysis after intra-arterial therapy may predict patient survival. • Volumetric tumour response assessment shows advantages over 1D and 2D techniques. • Enhancement-based MR response assessment is preferable to size-based measurements.
The peritumoral edema index and related mechanisms influence the prognosis of GBM patients.
Fang Z, Shu T, Luo P, Shao Y, Lin L, Tu Z Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1417208.
PMID: 39534094 PMC: 11554619. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417208.
De B, Dogra P, Zaid M, Elganainy D, Sun K, Amer A medRxiv. 2024; .
PMID: 39314943 PMC: 11419200. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.11.24313334.
Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases.
Ghabili K, Windham-Herman A, Konstantinidis M, Murali N, Borde T, Adam L Ann Hepatol. 2024; 29(6):101529.
PMID: 39033928 PMC: 11558520. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101529.
Mansouri Z, Salimi Y, Hajianfar G, Wolf N, Knappe L, Xhepa G Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):4111-4126.
PMID: 38981950 PMC: 11639191. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06805-8.
Advancements in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Imaging and Future Frontiers.
Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Blake M, Anderson M, Mojtahed A, Bradley W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).
PMID: 38892992 PMC: 11172657. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113281.