» Articles » PMID: 25636420

Early Survival Prediction After Intra-arterial Therapies: a 3D Quantitative MRI Assessment of Tumour Response After TACE or Radioembolization of Colorectal Cancer Metastases to the Liver

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Feb 1
PMID 25636420
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: This study evaluated the predictive role of 1D, 2D and 3D quantitative, enhancement-based MRI regarding overall survival (OS) in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM) following intra-arterial therapies (IAT).

Methods: This retrospective analysis included 29 patients who underwent transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or radioembolization and received MRI within 6 weeks after therapy. Tumour response was assessed using 1D and 2D criteria (such as European Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines [EASL] and modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [mRECIST]). In addition, a segmentation-based 3D quantification of overall (volumetric [v] RECIST) and enhancing lesion volume (quantitative [q] EASL) was performed on portal venous phase MRI. Accordingly, patients were classified as responders (R) and non-responders (NR). Survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using Cox proportional hazard ratios (HR).

Results: Only enhancement-based criteria identified patients as responders. EASL and mRECIST did not predict patient survival (P = 0.27 and P = 0.44, respectively). Using uni- and multivariate analysis, qEASL was identified as the sole predictor of patient survival (9.9 months for R, 6.9 months for NR; P = 0.038; HR 0.4).

Conclusion: The ability of qEASL to predict survival early after IAT provides evidence for potential advantages of 3D quantitative tumour analysis.

Key Points: • Volumetric assessment of colorectal liver metastases after intra-arterial therapy is feasible. • Early 3D quantitative tumour analysis after intra-arterial therapy may predict patient survival. • Volumetric tumour response assessment shows advantages over 1D and 2D techniques. • Enhancement-based MR response assessment is preferable to size-based measurements.

Citing Articles

The peritumoral edema index and related mechanisms influence the prognosis of GBM patients.

Fang Z, Shu T, Luo P, Shao Y, Lin L, Tu Z Front Oncol. 2024; 14:1417208.

PMID: 39534094 PMC: 11554619. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1417208.


Measurable imaging-based changes in enhancement of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after radiotherapy reflect physical mechanisms of response.

De B, Dogra P, Zaid M, Elganainy D, Sun K, Amer A medRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39314943 PMC: 11419200. DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.11.24313334.


Outcomes of repeat conventional transarterial chemoembolization in patients with liver metastases.

Ghabili K, Windham-Herman A, Konstantinidis M, Murali N, Borde T, Adam L Ann Hepatol. 2024; 29(6):101529.

PMID: 39033928 PMC: 11558520. DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101529.


The role of biomarkers and dosimetry parameters in overall and progression free survival prediction for patients treated with personalized Y glass microspheres SIRT: a preliminary machine learning study.

Mansouri Z, Salimi Y, Hajianfar G, Wolf N, Knappe L, Xhepa G Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2024; 51(13):4111-4126.

PMID: 38981950 PMC: 11639191. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-024-06805-8.


Advancements in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: Imaging and Future Frontiers.

Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Blake M, Anderson M, Mojtahed A, Bradley W J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892992 PMC: 11172657. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113281.


References
1.
Haddad A, Bani Hani M, Pawlik T, Cunningham S . Colorectal liver metastases. Int J Surg Oncol. 2012; 2011:285840. PMC: 3263663. DOI: 10.1155/2011/285840. View

2.
Cunningham D, Atkin W, Lenz H, Lynch H, Minsky B, Nordlinger B . Colorectal cancer. Lancet. 2010; 375(9719):1030-47. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60353-4. View

3.
Hipps D, Ausania F, Manas D, Rose J, French J . Selective Interarterial Radiation Therapy (SIRT) in Colorectal Liver Metastases: How Do We Monitor Response?. HPB Surg. 2013; 2013:570808. PMC: 3830800. DOI: 10.1155/2013/570808. View

4.
Halappa V, Corona-Villalobos C, Bonekamp S, Li Z, Reyes D, Cosgrove D . Neuroendocrine liver metastasis treated by using intraarterial therapy: volumetric functional imaging biomarkers of early tumor response and survival. Radiology. 2012; 266(2):502-13. PMC: 4104809. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.12120495. View

5.
Gonzalez-Guindalini F, Botelho M, Harmath C, Sandrasegaran K, Miller F, Salem R . Assessment of liver tumor response to therapy: role of quantitative imaging. Radiographics. 2013; 33(6):1781-800. DOI: 10.1148/rg.336135511. View