» Articles » PMID: 25635590

Can Structural Features of Kinase Receptors Provide Clues on Selectivity and Inhibition? A Molecular Modeling Study

Overview
Date 2015 Jan 31
PMID 25635590
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cancer is a complex disease resulting from the uncontrolled proliferation of cell signaling events. Protein kinases have been identified as central molecules that participate overwhelmingly in oncogenic events, thus becoming key targets for anticancer drugs. A majority of studies converged on the idea that ligand-binding pockets of kinases retain clues to the inhibiting abilities and cross-reacting tendencies of inhibitor drugs. Even though these ideas are critical for drug discovery, validating them using experiments is not only difficult, but also in some cases infeasible. To overcome these limitations and to test these ideas at the molecular level, we present here the results of receptor-focused in-silico docking of nine marketed drugs to 19 different wild-type and mutated kinases chosen from a wide range of families. This investigation highlights the need for using relevant models to explain the correct inhibition trends and the results are used to make predictions that might be able to influence future experiments. Our simulation studies are able to correctly predict the primary targets for each drug studied in majority of cases and our results agree with the existing findings. Our study shows that the conformations a given receptor acquires during kinase activation, and their micro-environment, defines the ligand partners. Type II drugs display high compatibility and selectivity for DFG-out kinase conformations. On the other hand Type I drugs are less selective and show binding preferences for both the open and closed forms of selected kinases. Using this receptor-focused approach, it is possible to capture the observed fold change in binding affinities between the wild-type and disease-centric mutations in ABL kinase for Imatinib and the second-generation ABL drugs. The effects of mutation are also investigated for two other systems, EGFR and B-Raf. Finally, by including pathway information in the design it is possible to model kinase inhibitors with potentially fewer side-effects.

Citing Articles

Molecular modeling provides a structural basis for PERK inhibitor selectivity towards RIPK1.

Chintha C, Carlesso A, Gorman A, Samali A, Eriksson L RSC Adv. 2022; 10(1):367-375.

PMID: 35558862 PMC: 9092956. DOI: 10.1039/c9ra08047c.


A mechanism for localized dynamics-driven activation in Bruton's tyrosine kinase.

Qiu S, Liu Y, Li Q R Soc Open Sci. 2021; 8(8):210066.

PMID: 34457331 PMC: 8371364. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.210066.


How to design potent and selective DYRK1B inhibitors? Molecular modeling study.

Szamborska-Gbur A, Rutkowska E, Dreas A, Frid M, Vilenchik M, Milik M J Mol Model. 2019; 25(2):41.

PMID: 30673861 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-018-3921-3.


The oleocanthal-based homovanillyl sinapate as a novel c-Met inhibitor.

Mohyeldin M, Akl M, Ebrahim H, Dragoi A, Dykes S, Cardelli J Oncotarget. 2016; 7(22):32247-73.

PMID: 27086914 PMC: 5078011. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.8681.

References
1.
Balak M, Gong Y, Riely G, Somwar R, Li A, Zakowski M . Novel D761Y and common secondary T790M mutations in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant lung adenocarcinomas with acquired resistance to kinase inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res. 2006; 12(21):6494-501. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1570. View

2.
Nagar B, Hantschel O, Young M, Scheffzek K, Veach D, Bornmann W . Structural basis for the autoinhibition of c-Abl tyrosine kinase. Cell. 2003; 112(6):859-71. DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00194-6. View

3.
Birge R, Fajardo J, Mayer B, Hanafusa H . Tyrosine-phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor and cellular p130 provide high affinity binding substrates to analyze Crk-phosphotyrosine-dependent interactions in vitro. J Biol Chem. 1992; 267(15):10588-95. View

4.
Knight Z, Lin H, Shokat K . Targeting the cancer kinome through polypharmacology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010; 10(2):130-7. PMC: 2880454. DOI: 10.1038/nrc2787. View

5.
Getlik M, Grutter C, Simard J, Kluter S, Rabiller M, Rode H . Hybrid compound design to overcome the gatekeeper T338M mutation in cSrc. J Med Chem. 2009; 52(13):3915-26. DOI: 10.1021/jm9002928. View