» Articles » PMID: 25629809

A Sensory-motor Control Model of Animal Flight Explains Why Bats Fly Differently in Light Versus Dark

Overview
Journal PLoS Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2015 Jan 29
PMID 25629809
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Animal flight requires fine motor control. However, it is unknown how flying animals rapidly transform noisy sensory information into adequate motor commands. Here we developed a sensorimotor control model that explains vertebrate flight guidance with high fidelity. This simple model accurately reconstructed complex trajectories of bats flying in the dark. The model implies that in order to apply appropriate motor commands, bats have to estimate not only the angle-to-target, as was previously assumed, but also the angular velocity ("proportional-derivative" controller). Next, we conducted experiments in which bats flew in light conditions. When using vision, bats altered their movements, reducing the flight curvature. This change was explained by the model via reduction in sensory noise under vision versus pure echolocation. These results imply a surprising link between sensory noise and movement dynamics. We propose that this sensory-motor link is fundamental to motion control in rapidly moving animals under different sensory conditions, on land, sea, or air.

Citing Articles

Fish couple forecasting with feedback control to chase and capture moving prey.

Martin B, Sparks D, Hein A, Liao J Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2031):20241463.

PMID: 39317312 PMC: 11421899. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.1463.


An artificial neural network explains how bats might use vision for navigation.

Goldshtein A, Akrish S, Giryes R, Yovel Y Commun Biol. 2022; 5(1):1325.

PMID: 36463311 PMC: 9719490. DOI: 10.1038/s42003-022-04260-5.


Tuning movement for sensing in an uncertain world.

Chen C, Murphey T, MacIver M Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32959777 PMC: 7508562. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52371.


Sensory gaze stabilization in echolocating bats.

Eitan O, Kosa G, Yovel Y Proc Biol Sci. 2019; 286(1913):20191496.

PMID: 31615357 PMC: 6834050. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2019.1496.


A fully autonomous terrestrial bat-like acoustic robot.

Eliakim I, Cohen Z, Kosa G, Yovel Y PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(9):e1006406.

PMID: 30188901 PMC: 6126821. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006406.


References
1.
Yovel Y, Falk B, Moss C, Ulanovsky N . Active control of acoustic field-of-view in a biosonar system. PLoS Biol. 2011; 9(9):e1001150. PMC: 3172196. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001150. View

2.
Watts P, Mitchell E, Swartz S . A computational model for estimating the mechanics of horizontal flapping flight in bats: model description and validation. J Exp Biol. 2001; 204(Pt 16):2873-98. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.16.2873. View

3.
Kuc R . Sensorimotor model of bat echolocation and prey capture. J Acoust Soc Am. 1994; 96(4):1965-78. DOI: 10.1121/1.410140. View

4.
Ghose K, Moss C . Steering by hearing: a bat's acoustic gaze is linked to its flight motor output by a delayed, adaptive linear law. J Neurosci. 2006; 26(6):1704-10. PMC: 3437256. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4315-05.2006. View

5.
Harris C, Wolpert D . Signal-dependent noise determines motor planning. Nature. 1998; 394(6695):780-4. DOI: 10.1038/29528. View