» Articles » PMID: 25627168

Evaluating Changes in Structure and Cytotoxicity During in Vitro Degradation of Three-dimensional Printed Scaffolds

Overview
Date 2015 Jan 29
PMID 25627168
Citations 23
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated the structural, mechanical, and cytocompatibility changes of three-dimensional (3D) printed porous polymer scaffolds during degradation. Three porous scaffold designs were fabricated from a poly(propylene fumarate) (PPF) resin. PPF is a hydrolytically degradable polymer that has been well characterized for applications in bone tissue engineering. Over a 224 day period, scaffolds were hydrolytically degraded and changes in scaffold parameters, such as porosity and pore size, were measured nondestructively using micro-computed tomography. In addition, changes in scaffold mechanical properties were also measured during degradation. Scaffold degradation was verified through decreasing pH and increasing mass loss as well as the formation of micropores and surface channels. Current methods to evaluate polymer cytotoxicity have been well established; however, the ability to evaluate toxicity of an absorbable polymer as it degrades has not been well explored. This study, therefore, also proposes a novel method to evaluate the cytotoxicity of the absorbable scaffolds using a combination of degradation extract, phosphate-buffered saline, and cell culture media. Fibroblasts were incubated with this combination media, and cytotoxicity was evaluated using XTT assay and fluorescence imaging. Cell culture testing demonstrated that the 3D-printed scaffold extracts did not induce significant cell death. In addition, results showed that over a 224 day time period, porous PPF scaffolds provided mechanical stability while degrading. Overall, these results show that degradable, 3D-printed PPF scaffolds are suitable for bone tissue engineering through the use of a novel toxicity during degradation assay.

Citing Articles

Development of Recombinant Human Collagen-Based Porous Scaffolds for Skin Tissue Engineering: Enhanced Mechanical Strength and Biocompatibility.

Yang Y, Yu T, Tao M, Wang Y, Yao X, Zhu C Polymers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39940505 PMC: 11820873. DOI: 10.3390/polym17030303.


3D Bioprinting for Engineered Tissue Constructs and Patient-Specific Models: Current Progress and Prospects in Clinical Applications.

Lee S, Jeong W, Atala A Adv Mater. 2024; 36(49):e2408032.

PMID: 39420757 PMC: 11875024. DOI: 10.1002/adma.202408032.


Application of Tissue Engineering and Biomaterials in Nose Surgery.

Farahani P JPRAS Open. 2024; 40:262-272.

PMID: 38708386 PMC: 11067003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpra.2023.11.001.


3D printing technology and its combination with nanotechnology in bone tissue engineering.

Wu Y, Ji Y, Lyu Z Biomed Eng Lett. 2024; 14(3):451-464.

PMID: 38645590 PMC: 11026358. DOI: 10.1007/s13534-024-00350-x.


Use of Biomaterials in 3D Printing as a Solution to Microbial Infections in Arthroplasty and Osseous Reconstruction.

Periferakis A, Periferakis A, Troumpata L, Dragosloveanu S, Timofticiuc I, Georgatos-Garcia S Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(3).

PMID: 38534839 PMC: 10968486. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9030154.


References
1.
Karageorgiou V, Kaplan D . Porosity of 3D biomaterial scaffolds and osteogenesis. Biomaterials. 2005; 26(27):5474-91. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002. View

2.
Artel A, Mehdizadeh H, Chiu Y, Brey E, Cinar A . An agent-based model for the investigation of neovascularization within porous scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011; 17(17-18):2133-41. DOI: 10.1089/ten.tea.2010.0571. View

3.
Kasper F, Tanahashi K, Fisher J, Mikos A . Synthesis of poly(propylene fumarate). Nat Protoc. 2009; 4(4):518-25. PMC: 3076598. DOI: 10.1038/nprot.2009.24. View

4.
Adachi T, Osako Y, Tanaka M, Hojo M, Hollister S . Framework for optimal design of porous scaffold microstructure by computational simulation of bone regeneration. Biomaterials. 2006; 27(21):3964-72. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.02.039. View

5.
Fisher J, Dean D, Mikos A . Photocrosslinking characteristics and mechanical properties of diethyl fumarate/poly(propylene fumarate) biomaterials. Biomaterials. 2002; 23(22):4333-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0142-9612(02)00178-3. View