» Articles » PMID: 25626571

Segmental Distributions of Calcifications and Non-assessable Lesions on Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography: Evaluation in Symptomatic Patients

Overview
Journal Jpn J Radiol
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Jan 29
PMID 25626571
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To clarify the frequency and distribution pattern of calcifications in all and in only non-assessable coronary arterial segments in symptomatic patients with coronary heart disease.

Materials And Methods: Among 2355 consecutive coronary CT angiographies performed using a 320-row ADCT, 1129 studies performed by prospective one-beat scanning without metallic and motion artifacts were evaluated. Frequency and degree of calcification were assessed for each coronary segment. Evaluations were performed in all and in only non-assessable segments, and the results were compared.

Results: Calcified segments were observed in 15.6 % of patients and 2.4 % of segments. The most extensively calcified segments were those in the proximal left anterior descending branch. 1.1 % of all of the segments were not assessable due to calcification, and 90 % of those non-assessable segments had high-grade calcifications. When the calcium score value was 1000 or 2000, the expected frequency of non-assessable segments was 27.5 or 53.5 %, respectively.

Conclusion: There were specific features of the distribution of coronary arterial calcifications. It is important to be familiar with these features when deciding whether or not to perform subtraction CCTA.

Citing Articles

New Year's resolution: increase the impact factor of this journal.

Tamaki N Jpn J Radiol. 2016; 34(1):1-2.

PMID: 26811175 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0500-8.


Subtraction coronary computed tomography in patients with severe calcification.

Amanuma M, Kondo T, Sano T, Sekine T, Takayanagi T, Matsutani H Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 31(8):1635-42.

PMID: 26288954 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-015-0746-3.


Proximal LAD atherosclerosis: milking-like effect of the septal perforator branches.

Wasilewski J, Desperak P Jpn J Radiol. 2015; 33(8):523-4.

PMID: 26082169 DOI: 10.1007/s11604-015-0439-9.

References
1.
Naghavi M, Libby P, Falk E, Casscells S, Litovsky S, Rumberger J . From vulnerable plaque to vulnerable patient: a call for new definitions and risk assessment strategies: Part I. Circulation. 2003; 108(14):1664-72. DOI: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000087480.94275.97. View

2.
Sosnowski M, Parma Z, Czekaj A, Tendera M . Traditional risk factors and coronary artery calcium in young adults. Cardiol J. 2012; 19(4):402-7. DOI: 10.5603/cj.2012.0072. View

3.
Tanaka R, Yoshioka K, Muranaka K, Chiba T, Ueda T, Sasaki T . Improved evaluation of calcified segments on coronary CT angiography: a feasibility study of coronary calcium subtraction. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29 Suppl 2:75-81. DOI: 10.1007/s10554-013-0316-5. View

4.
Agatston A, Janowitz W, HILDNER F, Zusmer N, VIAMONTE Jr M, Detrano R . Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15(4):827-32. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90282-t. View

5.
Hecht H, Narula J . Coronary artery calcium scanning in asymptomatic patients with diabetes mellitus: a paradigm shift. J Diabetes. 2012; 4(4):342-50. DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-0407.2012.00212.x. View