» Articles » PMID: 25623151

Therapeutic Effect of Intranasal Evaporative Cooling in Patients with Migraine: a Pilot Study

Overview
Journal J Headache Pain
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Jan 28
PMID 25623151
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Cryotherapy is the most common non-pharmacological pain-relieving method. The aim of this pilot study was to ascertain whether intranasal evaporative cooling may be an effective intervention in an acute migraine attack. Studies have previously demonstrated effectiveness of a variety of cryotherapy approaches. Intranasal evaporative cooling due to vascular anatomy, allows the transfer of venous blood from nasal and paranasal mucous membranes to the dura mater, thereby providing an excellent anatomical basis for the cooling processes.

Methods: We conducted a prospective, open-label, observational, pilot study. Twenty-eight patients who satisfied the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD 2) diagnostic criteria for migraine were recruited. A total of 20 treatments were administered in 15 patients. All patients provided pain severity scores and migraine-associated symptoms severity scores (based on a 0-10 visual analogue scale, [VAS]).

Results: Out of the 20 treatments, intranasal evaporative cooling rendered patients' pain and symptoms free immediately after treatment, in 8 of the treatments (40%), a further 10 treatments (50%) resulted in partial pain relief (headache reduced from severe or moderate to mild) and partial symptoms relief. At 2 hours, 9 treatments (45%) provided full pain and symptoms relief, with a further 9 treatments (45%) resulting in partial pain and symptoms relief. At 24 hours, 10 treatments (50%) resulted in patients reporting pain and symptom freedom and 3 (15%) provided partial pain relief. In summary 13 patients (87%) had benefit from the treatment within 2 hours that was sustained at 24 hours.

Conclusions: Intranasal evaporative cooling gave considerable benefit to patients with migraine, improving headache severity and migraine-associated symptoms. A further randomised, placebo controlled, double blinded, parallel clinical trial is required to further investigate the potential of this application.

Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov registered trial, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01898455.

Citing Articles

Activation of central and peripheral transient receptor potential melastatin 8 increases susceptibility to spreading depolarization and facilitates trigeminal neuroinflammation.

Liu T, Chen P, Tseng C, Chen Y, Chen J, Ni T J Headache Pain. 2025; 26(1):55.

PMID: 40087597 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-025-01997-2.


A Feasibility Trial on Intranasal Evaporative Cooling for Acute Migraine in an At-Home Setting.

Wolff M, Winnberg I, Tronvik E, Bakhsheshi M, Midlov P Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e72911.

PMID: 39628733 PMC: 11612867. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72911.


[Complementary and supplementary procedures in the treatment of headache].

Gaul C, Zaranek L, Gossrau G Schmerz. 2023; 37(6):448-460.

PMID: 37432483 DOI: 10.1007/s00482-023-00738-1.


Selective denervation of the corrugator supercilii muscle for the treatment of idiopatic trigeminal neuralgia purely paroxysmal distributed in the supraorbital and suprathrochlear dermatomes.

Gualdi A, Cambiaso-Daniel J, Gatti J, Peled Z, Hagan R, Bertossi D J Headache Pain. 2021; 22(1):9.

PMID: 33663369 PMC: 7931360. DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01218-6.


Paranasal sinus air suction for immediate pain relief of acute migraine - a randomized, double blind pilot study.

Bandara S, Samita S, Kiridana A, Ralapanawa D, Herath H BMC Neurol. 2019; 19(1):248.

PMID: 31646974 PMC: 6813051. DOI: 10.1186/s12883-019-1486-0.


References
1.
ABRAMSON D . PHYSIOLOGIC BASIS FOR THE USE OF PHYSICAL AGENTS IN PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISORDERS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1965; 46:216-44. View

2.
Merrick M . Secondary injury after musculoskeletal trauma: a review and update. J Athl Train. 2006; 37(2):209-17. PMC: 164347. View

3.
Zachariassen K . Hypothermia and cellular physiology. Arctic Med Res. 1991; 50 Suppl 6:13-7. View

4.
Nakajima S, Meyer J, Amano T, Shaw T, Okabe T, Mortel K . Cerebral vasomotor responsiveness during 100% oxygen inhalation in cerebral ischemia. Arch Neurol. 1983; 40(5):271-6. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1983.04050050039004. View

5.
Ramsey I, Delling M, Clapham D . An introduction to TRP channels. Annu Rev Physiol. 2006; 68:619-47. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.physiol.68.040204.100431. View