» Articles » PMID: 25622311

Pharmacokinetic Tumor Heterogeneity As a Prognostic Biomarker for Classifying Breast Cancer Recurrence Risk

Overview
Date 2015 Jan 27
PMID 25622311
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Goal: Heterogeneity in cancer can affect response to therapy and patient prognosis. Histologic measures have classically been used to measure heterogeneity, although a reliable noninvasive measurement is needed both to establish baseline risk of recurrence and monitor response to treatment. Here, we propose using spatiotemporal wavelet kinetic features from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to quantify intratumor heterogeneity in breast cancer.

Methods: Tumor pixels are first partitioned into homogeneous subregions using pharmacokinetic measures. Heterogeneity wavelet kinetic (HetWave) features are then extracted from these partitions to obtain spatiotemporal patterns of the wavelet coefficients and the contrast agent uptake. The HetWave features are evaluated in terms of their prognostic value using a logistic regression classifier with genetic algorithm wrapper-based feature selection to classify breast cancer recurrence risk as determined by a validated gene expression assay.

Results: Receiver operating characteristic analysis and area under the curve (AUC) are computed to assess classifier performance using leave-one-out cross validation. The HetWave features outperform other commonly used features (AUC = 0.88 HetWave versus 0.70 standard features). The combination of HetWave and standard features further increases classifier performance (AUCs 0.94).

Conclusion: The rate of the spatial frequency pattern over the pharmacokinetic partitions can provide valuable prognostic information.

Significance: HetWave could be a powerful feature extraction approach for characterizing tumor heterogeneity, providing valuable prognostic information.

Citing Articles

Prediction of non-perfusion volume ratio for uterine fibroids treated with ultrasound-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound based on MRI radiomics combined with clinical parameters.

Zhou Y, Zhang J, Li C, Chen J, Lv F, Deng Y Biomed Eng Online. 2023; 22(1):123.

PMID: 38093245 PMC: 10717163. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-023-01182-z.


An efficient transfer learning based cross model classification (TLBCM) technique for the prediction of breast cancer.

Jakkaladiki S, Maly F PeerJ Comput Sci. 2023; 9:e1281.

PMID: 37346575 PMC: 10280457. DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.1281.


Clinic-radiomics model using liver magnetic resonance imaging helps predict chronicity of drug-induced liver injury.

Fu H, Shen Z, Lai R, Zhou T, Huang Y, Zhao S Hepatol Int. 2023; 17(6):1626-1636.

PMID: 37188998 DOI: 10.1007/s12072-023-10539-4.


The Role of Deep Learning in Advancing Breast Cancer Detection Using Different Imaging Modalities: A Systematic Review.

Madani M, Mahdi Behzadi M, Nabavi S Cancers (Basel). 2022; 14(21).

PMID: 36358753 PMC: 9655692. DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215334.


Invasive ductal breast cancer molecular subtype prediction by MRI radiomic and clinical features based on machine learning.

Sheng W, Xia S, Wang Y, Yan L, Ke S, Mellisa E Front Oncol. 2022; 12:964605.

PMID: 36172153 PMC: 9510620. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.964605.


References
1.
Ashraf A, Daye D, Gavenonis S, Mies C, Feldman M, Rosen M . Identification of intrinsic imaging phenotypes for breast cancer tumors: preliminary associations with gene expression profiles. Radiology. 2014; 272(2):374-84. PMC: 4564060. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14131375. View

2.
Paik S, Tang G, Shak S, Kim C, Baker J, Kim W . Gene expression and benefit of chemotherapy in women with node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006; 24(23):3726-34. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.7985. View

3.
Chen W, Giger M, Lan L, Bick U . Computerized interpretation of breast MRI: investigation of enhancement-variance dynamics. Med Phys. 2004; 31(5):1076-82. DOI: 10.1118/1.1695652. View

4.
Levman J, Leung T, Causer P, Plewes D, Martel A . Classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast lesions by support vector machines. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27(5):688-96. PMC: 2891012. DOI: 10.1109/TMI.2008.916959. View

5.
Parikh J, Selmi M, Charles-Edwards G, Glendenning J, Ganeshan B, Verma H . Changes in primary breast cancer heterogeneity may augment midtreatment MR imaging assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Radiology. 2014; 272(1):100-12. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14130569. View