» Articles » PMID: 25621805

Impact of CR Before and After Allogeneic and Autologous Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: Results from the EBMT NMAM2000 Prospective Trial

Abstract

Previous studies have shown that obtaining complete hematologic remission (CR) in multiple myeloma is an important predictor of PFS and OS. This applies both to autologous and allogeneic transplantation. However, the importance of CR obtained before vs after second transplant or following allogeneic vs autologous transplantation is not clear. We investigated the role of CR analyzing data from the EBMT-NMAM2000 interventional prospective study comparing tandem autologous/reduced intensity conditioning allogeneic transplantation (auto/RICallo) to autologous transplantation-single or double (auto/auto). Allocation to treatment was performed according to availability of a matched sibling donor. Cox regression and multi-state models were applied. The long-term probability of survival in CR was superior in auto/RICallo, both comparing groups according to treatment allocated at start (28.8 vs 11.4% at 60 months, P=0.0004) and according to actual administration of second transplant (25.6 vs 9.6% at 60 months, P=0.008). CR achieved before the second transplant was predictive for PFS (hazard ratio (HR)=0.44, P= 0.003) and OS (HR 0.51, P=0.047) irrespective of the type of second transplant. CR achieved after auto/RICallo was more beneficial for PFS (HR=0.53, P=0.027) than CR after auto/auto (HR=0.81, P=0.390), indicating a better durability of CR obtained after an allotransplant procedure.

Citing Articles

Prognostic factors and treatment outcomes of allogeneic stem cell transplantation in lymphoid malignancy.

Kim H, Chung H, Kook H, Kim S, Kim Y, Cho H Blood Res. 2025; 60(1):12.

PMID: 39928273 PMC: 11811309. DOI: 10.1007/s44313-025-00060-y.


Benefits and risks of clofarabine in adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia investigated in depth by multi-state modeling.

Hermans S, van Norden Y, Versluis J, Rijneveld A, van der Holt B, de Weerdt O Cancer Med. 2024; 13(9):e6756.

PMID: 38680089 PMC: 11056700. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6756.


Nation-Wide Retrospective Analysis of Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation in Patients with Multiple Myeloma: A Study from Korean Multiple Myeloma Working Party (KMM1913).

Shin H, Kim D, Kim K, Min C, Lee J, Mun Y Cancer Res Treat. 2024; 56(3):956-966.

PMID: 38453275 PMC: 11261201. DOI: 10.4143/crt.2024.074.


The added value of multi-state modelling in a randomized controlled trial: The HOVON 102 study re-analyzed.

Bakunina K, Putter H, Versluis J, Koster E, van der Holt B, Manz M Cancer Med. 2021; 11(3):630-640.

PMID: 34953042 PMC: 8817075. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.4392.


Allogeneic Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma-Does It Still Have a Place?.

Gahrton G, Iacobelli S, Garderet L, Yakoub-Agha I, Schonland S J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7).

PMID: 32664274 PMC: 7408931. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072180.


References
1.
Wang M, Delasalle K, Feng L, Thomas S, Giralt S, Qazilbash M . CR represents an early index of potential long survival in multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2009; 45(3):498-504. PMC: 5777472. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2009.176. View

2.
Iacobelli S . Suggestions on the use of statistical methodologies in studies of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2013; 48 Suppl 1:S1-37. DOI: 10.1038/bmt.2012.282. View

3.
Alexanian R, Weber D, Giralt S, Dimopoulos M, Delasalle K, Smith T . Impact of complete remission with intensive therapy in patients with responsive multiple myeloma. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2001; 27(10):1037-43. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703035. View

4.
Tricot G, Vesole D, Jagannath S, Hilton J, Munshi N, Barlogie B . Graft-versus-myeloma effect: proof of principle. Blood. 1996; 87(3):1196-8. View

5.
Iacobelli S, Apperley J, Morris C . Assessment of the role of timing of second transplantation in multiple myeloma by multistate modeling. Exp Hematol. 2008; 36(11):1567-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.exphem.2008.06.007. View