Alberto L, Kalluri L, Esquivel-Upshaw J, Duan Y
Unknown. 2025; 5(1):34-43.
PMID: 39749100
PMC: 11694178.
DOI: 10.3390/ceramics5010004.
Gehrke P, Rashidpour M, Sader R, Weigl P
Int J Implant Dent. 2024; 10(1):20.
PMID: 38691258
PMC: 11063012.
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-024-00543-0.
Ma J, Zhang B, Song H, Wu D, Song T
Int J Implant Dent. 2023; 9(1):48.
PMID: 38055096
PMC: 10700249.
DOI: 10.1186/s40729-023-00517-8.
Cappare P, Tete G, DOrto B, Nagni M, Gherlone E
J Clin Med. 2023; 12(13).
PMID: 37445559
PMC: 10342767.
DOI: 10.3390/jcm12134524.
Mubaraki M, Al Moaleem M, Alzahrani A, Shariff M, Alqahtani S, Porwal A
Materials (Basel). 2022; 15(11).
PMID: 35683165
PMC: 9182039.
DOI: 10.3390/ma15113868.
Improved accuracy of digital implant impressions with newly designed scan bodies: an in vivo evaluation in beagle dogs.
Huang R, Liu Y, Huang B, Zhou F, Chen Z, Li Z
BMC Oral Health. 2021; 21(1):623.
PMID: 34876122
PMC: 8650335.
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-021-01986-2.
Scaffold-Type Structure Dental Ceramics with Different Compositions Evaluated through Physicochemical Characteristics and Biosecurity Profiles.
Fabricky M, Gabor A, Milutinovici R, Watz C, Avram S, Draghici G
Materials (Basel). 2021; 14(9).
PMID: 33925656
PMC: 8124461.
DOI: 10.3390/ma14092266.
Digital Smile Designed Computer-Aided Surgery versus Traditional Workflow in "All on Four" Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial with 4-Years Follow-Up.
Cattoni F, Chirico L, Merlone A, Manacorda M, Vinci R, Gherlone E
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18(7).
PMID: 33810379
PMC: 8037328.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073449.
Accuracy of Portable Face-Scanning Devices for Obtaining Three-Dimensional Face Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Mai H, Kim J, Choi Y, Lee D
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 18(1).
PMID: 33375533
PMC: 7795319.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18010094.
Aesthetic Dentistry, How You Say and How You See: A 500-People Survey on Digital Preview and Color Perception.
Zotti F, Pappalardo D, Capocasale G, Sboarina A, Bertossi D, Albanese M
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent. 2020; 12:377-389.
PMID: 33061650
PMC: 7518775.
DOI: 10.2147/CCIDE.S274669.
Redesigning the Paradigms of Clinical Practice for Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery in the Era of Lockdown for COVID-19: From Tradition to Telesemeiology.
Robiony M, Bocin E, Sembronio S, Costa F, Bresadola V, Tel A
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(18).
PMID: 32932911
PMC: 7557395.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17186622.
Precision and practical usefulness of intraoral scanners in implant dentistry: A systematic literature review.
Garcia-Gil I, Cortes-Breton-Brinkmann J, Jimenez-Garcia J, Pelaez-Rico J, Suarez-Garcia M
J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12(8):e784-e793.
PMID: 32913577
PMC: 7474947.
DOI: 10.4317/jced.57025.
Impacts of Thresholds of Gray Value for Cone-Beam Computed Tomography 3D Reconstruction on the Accuracy of Image Matching with Optical Scan.
Park S, Yoon R, Lee H, Lee H, Choi Y, Lee D
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(17).
PMID: 32882986
PMC: 7503962.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17176375.
To evaluate and compare the accuracy of definitive casts using various splinting methods on implant level impressions in All-on-Four treatment: An study.
Shankar S, Doddamani S
J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2020; 20(2):193-201.
PMID: 32655224
PMC: 7335026.
DOI: 10.4103/jips.jips_210_19.
Accuracy of digital and conventional dental implant impressions for fixed partial dentures: A comparative clinical study.
Gedrimiene A, Adaskevicius R, Rutkunas V
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019; 11(5):271-279.
PMID: 31754417
PMC: 6856312.
DOI: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.5.271.
Milled versus moulded mock-ups based on the superimposition of 3D meshes from digital oral impressions: a comparative in vitro study in the aesthetic area.
Cattoni F, Tete G, Calloni A, Manazza F, Gastaldi G, Cappare P
BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1):230.
PMID: 31664999
PMC: 6819647.
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0922-2.
Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study.
Mangano F, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O
BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(1):101.
PMID: 31170969
PMC: 6555024.
DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.
Conventional versus Digital Impressions for Full Arch Screw-Retained Maxillary Rehabilitations: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Cappare P, Sannino G, Minoli M, Montemezzi P, Ferrini F
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019; 16(5).
PMID: 30866465
PMC: 6427545.
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16050829.
Digital versus Traditional Workflow for Posterior Maxillary Rehabilitations Supported by One Straight and One Tilted Implant: A 3-Year Prospective Comparative Study.
Ferrini F, Cappare P, Vinci R, Gherlone E, Sannino G
Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018:4149107.
PMID: 30534562
PMC: 6252190.
DOI: 10.1155/2018/4149107.
Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Digital Impression versus Conventional Method: Effect of Implant Angulation and Connection Type.
Alikhasi M, Siadat H, Nasirpour A, Hasanzade M
Int J Dent. 2018; 2018:3761750.
PMID: 29971107
PMC: 6008832.
DOI: 10.1155/2018/3761750.