What Are Memory-perception Interactions For? Implications for Action

Overview

Journal Front Psychol

Date 2015 Jan 27

PMID 25620945

Citations 1

Authors

Loic P Heurley

Laurent P Ferrier

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Citing Articles

Dopamine activity on the perceptual salience for recognition memory.

Osorio-Gomez D, Guzman-Ramos K, Bermudez-Rattoni F Front Behav Neurosci. 2022; 16:963739.

PMID: 36275849 PMC: 9583835. DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2022.963739.

References

Ellis R, Tucker M . Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. Br J Psychol. 2000; 91 ( Pt 4):451-71. DOI: 10.1348/000712600161934. View

Ferrier L, Staudt A, Reilhac G, Jimenez M, Brouillet D . [Influence of typical size of objects in a categorization task]. Can J Exp Psychol. 2008; 61(4):316-21. DOI: 10.1037/cjep2007031. View

Moretto G, di Pellegrino G . Grasping numbers. Exp Brain Res. 2008; 188(4):505-15. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1386-9. View

Gentilucci M, Gangitano M . Influence of automatic word reading on motor control. Eur J Neurosci. 1998; 10(2):752-6. DOI: 10.1046/j.1460-9568.1998.00060.x. View

Rubinsten O, Henik A . Is an ant larger than a lion?. Acta Psychol (Amst). 2002; 111(1):141-54. DOI: 10.1016/s0001-6918(02)00047-1. View

Hershenson M, Samuels S . An airplane illusion: apparent velocity determined by apparent distance. Perception. 2000; 28(4):433-6. DOI: 10.1068/p2779. View

Tanaka J, Weiskopf D, Williams P . The role of color in high-level vision. Trends Cogn Sci. 2001; 5(5):211-215. DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01626-0. View

Andres M, Ostry D, Nicol F, Paus T . Time course of number magnitude interference during grasping. Cortex. 2008; 44(4):414-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2007.08.007. View

Wykowska A, Schubo A, Hommel B . How you move is what you see: action planning biases selection in visual search. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009; 35(6):1755-69. DOI: 10.1037/a0016798. View

10.

Landau M, Meier B, Keefer L . A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychol Bull. 2010; 136(6):1045-67. DOI: 10.1037/a0020970. View

11.

Hosking S, Crassini B . The effects of familiar size and object trajectories on time-to-contact judgements. Exp Brain Res. 2010; 203(3):541-52. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-010-2258-7. View

12.

Glover S, Dixon P . Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping. Exp Brain Res. 2002; 146(3):383-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-002-1222-6. View

13.

Henik A, Tzelgov J . Is three greater than five: the relation between physical and semantic size in comparison tasks. Mem Cognit. 1982; 10(4):389-95. DOI: 10.3758/bf03202431. View

14.

Andres M, Davare M, Pesenti M, Olivier E, Seron X . Number magnitude and grip aperture interaction. Neuroreport. 2004; 15(18):2773-7. View

15.

Hosking S, Crassini B . The influence of optic expansion rates when judging the relative time to contact of familiar objects. J Vis. 2011; 11(6). DOI: 10.1167/11.6.20. View

16.

Glover S . Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action. Behav Brain Sci. 2004; 27(1):3-24. DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x04000020. View

17.

Estes Z, Verges M, Barsalou L . Head up, foot down: object words orient attention to the objects' typical location. Psychol Sci. 2008; 19(2):93-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02051.x. View

18.

DeLucia P . Does binocular disparity or familiar size information override effects of relative size on judgements of time to contact?. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005; 58(5):865-86. DOI: 10.1080/02724980443000377. View

19.

Gentilucci M, Benuzzi F, Bertolani L, Daprati E, Gangitano M . Language and motor control. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 133(4):468-90. DOI: 10.1007/s002210000431. View

20.

Konkle T, Oliva A . A familiar-size Stroop effect: real-world size is an automatic property of object representation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2012; 38(3):561-9. PMC: 3398124. DOI: 10.1037/a0028294. View