Incidence of Inadvertent Intravascular Injection During CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Epidural Steroid Injections

Overview

Journal AJNR Am J Neuroradiol

Specialty Neurology

Date 2015 Jan 24

PMID 25614475

Citations 10

Authors

P G Kranz

T J Amrhein

L Gray

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background And Purpose: Inadvertent intravascular injection during epidural steroid injection can result in complications and has been investigated previously with conventional fluoroscopy, but not CT fluoroscopy. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of intravascular injections recognized during CT fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injection.

Materials And Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 575 consecutive CT fluoroscopy-guided epidural steroid injections. Procedures were assessed to determine the incidence of intravascular injection. Cases positive for intravascular injection were classified on the basis of anatomic location, distance from the needle tip, washout pattern, and presence of combined epidural and vascular injection. Cases were also graded as either venous or arterial by using a 5-point scale.

Results: Intravascular injection was observed in 26% of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (7/27), 9% of cervical interlaminar epidural steroid injections (4/47), 8% of lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections (22/275), and 2% of lumbar interlaminar epidural steroid injections (4/222). Vessels were most commonly identified close to the needle, but in 30% of cases, they were visualized in the anterior paraspinal soft tissues remote from the needle. Washout was most commonly delayed (86%), though rapid washout occurred in 14% of cases. Simultaneous epidural and vascular injections occurred in 32% of cases. Most visualized vessels were venous, but 2 cases were classified as probably arterial.

Conclusions: Intravascular injections can be detected with CT fluoroscopy. The incidence in our study was similar to that in previous reports using conventional fluoroscopy. Technical factors such as the "double-tap" on CT fluoroscopy following contrast injection, assessment for discordance between injected and visualized contrast volume, and maintenance of an appropriate FOV facilitate the detection of such events.

Citing Articles

Posterior internal vertebral venous plexus, the "Black Ice" of epidural hematoma: A letter to the editor.

Amen C, Zhao Z Interv Pain Med. 2024; 3(3):100437.

PMID: 39502910 PMC: 11536296. DOI: 10.1016/j.inpm.2024.100437.

A review of epidural and non-epidural contrast flow patterns during fluoroscopic and CT-guided epidural steroid injections.

Madhavan A, Liebo G, Baffour F, Diehn F, Maus T, Murthy N Interv Neuroradiol. 2024; :15910199231221857.

PMID: 38179603 PMC: 11571312. DOI: 10.1177/15910199231221857.

Transforaminal versus interlaminar CT-guided lumbar epidural steroid injections: prospective study of 237 patients with unilateral radicular pain and up to 5 years of follow-up.

Bise S, Langlet B, Pesquer L, Poussange N, Silvestre A, Dallaudiere B Skeletal Radiol. 2023; 52(10):1959-1967.

PMID: 36729210 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04290-y.

Differential rates of intravascular uptake and pain perception during lumbosacral epidural injection among adults using a 22-gauge needle versus 25-gauge needle: a randomized clinical trial.

Raju R, Mehnert M, Stolzenberg D, Simon J, Conliffe T, Gehret J BMC Anesthesiol. 2020; 20(1):222.

PMID: 32883241 PMC: 7469311. DOI: 10.1186/s12871-020-01137-0.

Ultrasound-Guided Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transforaminal Epidural Block for the Treatment of Radicular Pain in the Lower Cervical Spine: A Retrospective Comparative....

Jang J, Lee W, Kim J, Cho K, Nam S, Park Y Pain Res Manag. 2020; 2020:9103421.

PMID: 32617125 PMC: 7306851. DOI: 10.1155/2020/9103421.

References

Manchikanti L, Pampati V, Falco F, Hirsch J . Assessment of the growth of epidural injections in the medicare population from 2000 to 2011. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(4):E349-64. View

McLean J, Sigler J, Plastaras C, Garvan C, Rittenberg J . The rate of detection of intravascular injection in cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections with and without digital subtraction angiography. PM R. 2009; 1(7):636-42. DOI: 10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.03.017. View

El Abd O, Daud Amadera J, Pimentel D, Pimentel T . In response to digital subtraction angiography is not the answer for safe epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2014; 17(3):E414-5. View

Chang Chien G, Candido K, Knezevic N . Digital subtraction angiography does not reliably prevent paraplegia associated with lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injection. Pain Physician. 2012; 15(6):515-23. View

Smuck M, Tang C, Fuller B . Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during cervical transforaminal epidural injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009; 34(21):E751-5. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181b043d1. View

Atluri S, Glaser S, Shah R, Sudarshan G . Needle position analysis in cases of paralysis from transforaminal epidurals: consider alternative approaches to traditional technique. Pain Physician. 2013; 16(4):321-34. View

Scanlon G, Moeller-Bertram T, Romanowsky S, Wallace M . Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections: more dangerous than we think?. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007; 32(11):1249-56. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318053ec50. View

Furman M, OBrien E, Zgleszewski T . Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal lumbosacral epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25(20):2628-32. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200010150-00014. View

Chang Chien G, Candido K . Digital subtraction angiography is not the answer for safe epidural injections. Pain Physician. 2014; 17(3):E413-4. View

10.

Wagner A . CT fluoroscopic-guided cervical nerve root blocks. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2005; 26(1):43-4. PMC: 7975026. View

11.

El Abd O, Daud Amadera J, Pimentel D, Pimentel T . Intravascular flow detection during transforaminal epidural injections: a prospective assessment. Pain Physician. 2014; 17(1):21-7. View

12.

Smuck M, Fuller B, Yoder B, Huerta J . Incidence of simultaneous epidural and vascular injection during lumbosacral transforaminal epidural injections. Spine J. 2007; 7(1):79-82. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.06.380. View

13.

Bose B . Quadriparesis following cervical epidural steroid injections: case report and review of the literature. Spine J. 2005; 5(5):558-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2005.03.015. View

14.

Hong J, Kim S, Huh B, Shin H . Analysis of inadvertent intradiscal and intravascular injection during lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections: a prospective study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2013; 38(6):520-5. DOI: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000010. View

15.

Jasper J . Role of digital subtraction fluoroscopic imaging in detecting intravascular injections. Pain Physician. 2006; 6(3):369-72. View

16.

Wagner A . CT fluoroscopy-guided epidural injections: technique and results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004; 25(10):1821-3. PMC: 8148733. View

17.

Nahm F, Lee C, Lee S, Kim T, Sim W, Cho H . Risk of intravascular injection in transforaminal epidural injections. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65(9):917-21. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06447.x. View

18.

Furman M, Giovanniello M, OBrien E . Incidence of intravascular penetration in transforaminal cervical epidural steroid injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003; 28(1):21-5. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200301010-00007. View

19.

Wolter T, Knoeller S, Berlis A, Hader C . CT-guided cervical selective nerve root block with a dorsal approach. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2010; 31(10):1831-6. PMC: 7964002. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A2230. View

20.

Smuck M, Fuller B, Chiodo A, Benny B, Singaracharlu B, Tong H . Accuracy of intermittent fluoroscopy to detect intravascular injection during transforaminal epidural injections. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008; 33(7):E205-10. DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816960fe. View