» Articles » PMID: 25611951

Degradation in the Fatigue Strength of Dentin by Diamond Bur Preparations: Importance of Cutting Direction

Overview
Date 2015 Jan 23
PMID 25611951
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objectives of this investigation were to evaluate the degradation in fatigue strength of dentin by diamond bur preparations and to identify the importance of cutting direction. Three groups of coronal dentin specimens were prepared from unrestored third molars, including a flaw free "control," and two groups that received a diamond bur cutting treatment performed parallel or perpendicular to the specimen length. The specimens were subjected to static or cyclic flexural loading to failure and the results were compared with data for carbide bur cutting. Under static loading diamond bur cutting resulted in significantly lower flexure strength (p ≤ 0.05) than the control for both cutting directions (from 154 to ∼124 MPa). However, there was no significant difference in the strength between the control and carbide bur treated specimens. Similarly, the fatigue strength of the diamond bur treated specimens was significantly lower (p ≤ 0.0001) than that of the control for both cutting directions. Cutting in the perpendicular direction resulted in nearly 60% reduction to the endurance limit (from 44 to 19 MPa). Based on the results, diamond bur cutting of cavity preparations causes a reduction in the fatigue strength of dentin, regardless of the cutting direction. To maintain the durability of dentin, cavity preparations introduced using diamond burs must be performed with appropriate cutting direction and followed by a finishing pass.

Citing Articles

Cutting Efficiency of Welded Diamond and Vacuum Diffusion Technology Burs and Conventional Electroplated Burs on the Surface Changes of the Teeth - An Study.

Sethi T, Nayakar R, Patil A Contemp Clin Dent. 2021; 12(3):259-265.

PMID: 34759683 PMC: 8525810. DOI: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_261_20.


The Tooth: Its Structure and Properties.

Arola D, Gao S, Zhang H, Masri R Dent Clin North Am. 2017; 61(4):651-668.

PMID: 28886762 PMC: 5774624. DOI: 10.1016/j.cden.2017.05.001.

References
1.
Lubisich E, Hilton T, Ferracane J . Cracked teeth: a review of the literature. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2010; 22(3):158-67. PMC: 3870147. DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8240.2010.00330.x. View

2.
Shemesh H, Bier C, Wu M, Tanomaru-Filho M, Wesselink P . The effects of canal preparation and filling on the incidence of dentinal defects. Int Endod J. 2009; 42(3):208-13. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2008.01502.x. View

3.
Bajaj D, Sundaram N, Nazari A, Arola D . Age, dehydration and fatigue crack growth in dentin. Biomaterials. 2005; 27(11):2507-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.11.035. View

4.
Banerjee A, Kidd E, Watson T . Scanning electron microscopic observations of human dentine after mechanical caries excavation. J Dent. 2000; 28(3):179-86. DOI: 10.1016/s0300-5712(99)00064-0. View

5.
Groth E, Mercer C, Anderson P . Microtomographic analysis of subsurface enamel and dentine following Er:YAG laser and acid etching. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2002; 9(2):73-9. View