» Articles » PMID: 25604307

[Operation Time for Suprapubic Transumbilical Cholecystectomy: Results of a Prospective Randomized Trial]

Overview
Journal Chirurg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2015 Jan 22
PMID 25604307
Citations 1
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Over the last decade new innovative minimally invasive techniques (e.g. transvaginal cholecystectomy and single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy) have been developed to reduce operative trauma, postoperative pain and to achieve better cosmetic results. Nevertheless, most of these techniques are more difficult and time-consuming than conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy (CLC). A new approach, the Minden technique for combined suprapubic transumbilical cholecystectomy (MI-CHE) has been proven to provide a very good cosmetic outcome with reduced operative trauma. The aim of this study was to survey whether MI-CHE prolongs operation times to a relevant degree compared to CLC.

Methods: A total of 40 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomized between both techniques. The duration of the operation and other perioperative data were recorded. Surgery was performed by four resident surgeons who had not yet performed any technique of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, neither MI-CHE nor CLC but were assisted by the same senior staff surgeon in all cases. The two patient groups showed no differences in age, gender and body mass index. The study was registered (DRKS00003271). Non-inferiority was tested using 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

Results: The mean operation time was shorter by - 4.2 min (95% CI, + 6.4 min to - 14.8 min) in the MI-CHE as compared to the CLC group (65.5 min versus 69.7 min). There were no open conversions but in one patient intestinal injury occurred during the umbilical mini-laparotomy. There were no differences in patient satisfaction and perioperative pain between both procedures.

Conclusion: The MI-CHE, which provides very good cosmetic results, is not more time-consuming than CLC. Additionally, it seems to be safe and not more difficult to learn than CLC.

Citing Articles

Suprapubic Cholecystectomy Improves Cosmetic Outcome Compared to Classic Cholecystectomy.

Taha A, Taha-Mehlitz S, Sternkopf U, Sorba E, Enodien B, Vorburger S J Clin Med. 2022; 11(15).

PMID: 35956193 PMC: 9369808. DOI: 10.3390/jcm11154579.

References
1.
Bachmann K, Izbicki J, Strate T . [A new cholecystectomy with no visible scarring and low risk. A possible alternative to natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery]. Chirurg. 2008; 80(11):1066-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-008-1644-1. View

2.
Bennett C, Stryker S, Ferreira M, Adams J, Beart Jr R . The learning curve for laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Preliminary results from a prospective analysis of 1194 laparoscopic-assisted colectomies. Arch Surg. 1997; 132(1):41-4; discussion 45. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1997.01430250043009. View

3.
Pucher P, Sodergren M, Singh P, Darzi A, Parakseva P . Have we learned from lessons of the past? A systematic review of training for single incision laparoscopic surgery. Surg Endosc. 2012; 27(5):1478-84. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-012-2632-6. View

4.
Luijendijk R, Jeekel J, Storm R, Schutte P, Hop W, DROGENDIJK A . The low transverse Pfannenstiel incision and the prevalence of incisional hernia and nerve entrapment. Ann Surg. 1997; 225(4):365-9. PMC: 1190743. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199704000-00004. View

5.
Johnston S, Kidney S, Sweeney K, Zaki A, TANNER W, Keane F . Changing trends in the management of gallstone disease. Surg Endosc. 2003; 17(5):781-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00464-002-9122-1. View