Factors of Psychopathy and Electrocortical Response to Emotional Pictures: Further Evidence for a Two-process Theory

Overview

Journal J Abnorm Psychol

Publisher American Psychological Association

Specialty Psychology

Date 2015 Jan 21

PMID 25603361

Citations 7

Authors

Noah C Venables

Jason R Hall

James R Yancey

Christopher J Patrick

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

The Two-Process theory of psychopathy posits that distinct etiological mechanisms contribute to the condition: (a) a weakness in defensive (fear) reactivity related to affective-interpersonal features, and (b) impaired cognitive-executive functioning, marked by reductions in brain responses such as P3, related to impulsive-antisocial features. The current study examined relations between psychopathy factors and electrocortical response to emotional and neutral pictures in male offenders (N = 139) assessed using the Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R). Impulsive-antisocial features of the PCL-R (Factor 2) were associated with reduced amplitude of earlier P3 brain response to pictures regardless of valence, whereas the affective-interpersonal dimension (Factor 1) was associated specifically with reductions in late positive potential response to aversive pictures. Findings provide further support for the Two-Process theory and add to a growing body of evidence linking the impulsive-antisocial facet of psychopathy to the broader construct of externalizing proneness. Findings are discussed in terms of current initiatives directed at incorporating neuroscientific concepts into psychopathology classification. (PsycINFO Database Record

Citing Articles

Social processing distorts physical distance perception.

Michalareas G, Lehr C, Grabenhorst M, Hecht H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):5669.

PMID: 39955347 PMC: 11830008. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89935-9.

Neurobiological Responses towards Stimuli Depicting Aggressive Interactions in Delinquent Young Adults and Controls: No Relation to Reactive and Proactive Aggression.

Ter Harmsel J, van Dongen J, Zijlmans J, van der Pol T, Marhe R, Popma A Brain Sci. 2022; 12(2).

PMID: 35203888 PMC: 8869761. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12020124.

Toward a multimodal measurement model for the neurobehavioral trait of affiliative capacity.

Palumbo I, Perkins E, Yancey J, Brislin S, Patrick C, Latzman R Personal Neurosci. 2020; 3:e11.

PMID: 33283145 PMC: 7681166. DOI: 10.1017/pen.2020.9.

Divergences among Three Higher-Order Self-Report Psychopathology Factors in Normal-Range Personality and Emotional Late Positive Potential Reactivity.

Rozalski V, Benning S J Res Pers. 2020; 82.

PMID: 32863467 PMC: 7449373. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrp.2019.103861.

Impaired processing of threat in psychopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of factorial data in male offender populations.

Kozhuharova P, Dickson H, Tully J, Blackwood N PLoS One. 2019; 14(10):e0224455.

PMID: 31661520 PMC: 6818800. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224455.

References

Patrick C, Bernat E, Malone S, Iacono W, Krueger R, McGue M . P300 amplitude as an indicator of externalizing in adolescent males. Psychophysiology. 2006; 43(1):84-92. PMC: 2242347. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2006.00376.x. View

Beauchaine T, McNulty T . Comorbidities and continuities as ontogenic processes: toward a developmental spectrum model of externalizing psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2013; 25(4 Pt 2):1505-28. PMC: 4008972. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579413000746. View

Iacono W, Malone S, McGue M . Substance use disorders, externalizing psychopathology, and P300 event-related potential amplitude. Int J Psychophysiol. 2003; 48(2):147-78. DOI: 10.1016/s0167-8760(03)00052-7. View

Semlitsch H, Anderer P, Schuster P, Presslich O . A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology. 1986; 23(6):695-703. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x. View

Venables N, Patrick C . Validity of the Externalizing Spectrum Inventory in a criminal offender sample: relations with disinhibitory psychopathology, personality, and psychopathic features. Psychol Assess. 2011; 24(1):88-100. PMC: 3721143. DOI: 10.1037/a0024703. View

Venables N, Patrick C, Hall J, Bernat E . Clarifying relations between dispositional aggression and brain potential response: overlapping and distinct contributions of impulsivity and stress reactivity. Biol Psychol. 2011; 86(3):279-88. PMC: 3089970. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.12.009. View

Patrick C, Bradley M, Lang P . Emotion in the criminal psychopath: startle reflex modulation. J Abnorm Psychol. 1993; 102(1):82-92. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.102.1.82. View

Benning S, Patrick C, Salekin R, Leistico A . Convergent and discriminant validity of psychopathy factors assessed via self-report: a comparison of three instruments. Assessment. 2005; 12(3):270-89. PMC: 2242351. DOI: 10.1177/1073191105277110. View

Polich J . Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118(10):2128-48. PMC: 2715154. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.019. View

10.

Patrick C, Durbin C, Moser J . Reconceptualizing antisocial deviance in neurobehavioral terms. Dev Psychopathol. 2012; 24(3):1047-71. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579412000533. View

11.

Venables N, Sellbom M, Sourander A, Kendler K, Joiner T, Drislane L . Separate and interactive contributions of weak inhibitory control and threat sensitivity to prediction of suicide risk. Psychiatry Res. 2015; 226(2-3):461-6. PMC: 4375034. DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.018. View

12.

Davidson R, Putnam K, Larson C . Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence. Science. 2000; 289(5479):591-4. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5479.591. View

13.

Kiehl K, Smith A, Hare R, Liddle P . An event-related potential investigation of response inhibition in schizophrenia and psychopathy. Biol Psychiatry. 2000; 48(3):210-21. DOI: 10.1016/s0006-3223(00)00834-9. View

14.

Morgan A, Lilienfeld S . A meta-analytic review of the relation between antisocial behavior and neuropsychological measures of executive function. Clin Psychol Rev. 2000; 20(1):113-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7358(98)00096-8. View

15.

Dindo L, Fowles D . Dual temperamental risk factors for psychopathic personality: evidence from self-report and skin conductance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010; 100(3):557-66. DOI: 10.1037/a0021848. View

16.

Gao Y, Raine A . P3 event-related potential impairments in antisocial and psychopathic individuals: a meta-analysis. Biol Psychol. 2009; 82(3):199-210. DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.06.006. View

17.

Gottesman I, Gould T . The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry. 2003; 160(4):636-45. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.160.4.636. View

18.

Blair R . Applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective to the disorder of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol. 2005; 17(3):865-91. DOI: 10.1017/S0954579405050418. View

19.

Anderson N, Stanford M . Demonstrating emotional processing differences in psychopathy using affective ERP modulation. Psychophysiology. 2012; 49(6):792-806. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01369.x. View

20.

Patrick C, Drislane L . Triarchic Model of Psychopathy: Origins, Operationalizations, and Observed Linkages with Personality and General Psychopathology. J Pers. 2014; 83(6):627-43. DOI: 10.1111/jopy.12119. View