» Articles » PMID: 25601382

The Effects of Progressive Lateralization of the Joint Center of Rotation of Reverse Total Shoulder Implants

Overview
Date 2015 Jan 21
PMID 25601382
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There has been a renewed interest in lateralizing the center of rotation (CoR) in implants used in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity of lateralization of the CoR on the glenohumeral joint contact forces, muscle moment arms, torque across the bone-implant interface, and the stability of the implant.

Methods: A 3-dimensional virtual model was used to investigate how lateralization affects deltoid muscle moment arm and glenohumeral joint contact forces. This model was virtually implanted with 5 progressively lateralized reverse shoulder prostheses. The joint contact loads and deltoid moment arms were calculated for each lateralization over the course of 3 simulated standard humerothoracic motions.

Results: Lateralization of the CoR leads to an increase in the overall joint contact forces across the glenosphere. Most of this increased loading occurred through compression, although increases in anterior/posterior and superior/inferior shear were also observed. Moment arms of the deltoid consistently decreased with lateralization. Bending moments at the implant interface increased with lateralization. Progressive lateralization resulted in improved stability ratios.

Conclusions: Lateralization results in increased joint loading. Most of that loading occurs through compression, although there were also increases in shear forces. Anterior/posterior shear is currently not accounted for in implant fixation studies, leaving its effect on implant fixation unknown. Future studies should incorporate shear forces into their models to more accurately assess fixation methods.

Citing Articles

Lateralisation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty - A narrative review.

Kumar K, Goyal D J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2025; 62():102881.

PMID: 39850727 PMC: 11751540. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcot.2024.102881.


Lateralization and inclination angle in reverse arthroplasty-what do we know?.

Ekelund A, Poncet D Shoulder Elbow. 2024; :17585732241281910.

PMID: 39545010 PMC: 11559928. DOI: 10.1177/17585732241281910.


Optimizing stability and motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with a 135° neck-shaft-angle: a computer model study of standard versus retentive humeral inserts.

Bauer S, Blakeney W, Lannes X, Wang A, Shao W JSES Int. 2024; 8(5):1087-1094.

PMID: 39280143 PMC: 11401560. DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2024.06.003.


Bone Density Changes at the Origin of the Deltoid Muscle following Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Caldaria A, Giovannetti de Sanctis E, Saccone L, Baldari A, Azzolina D, La Verde L J Clin Med. 2024; 13(13).

PMID: 38999260 PMC: 11242818. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13133695.


Analysis of three different reverse shoulder arthroplasty designs for cuff tear arthropathy - the combination of lateralization and distalization provides best mobility.

Freislederer F, Moroder P, Audige L, Schneller T, Ameziane Y, Trefzer R BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024; 25(1):204.

PMID: 38454432 PMC: 10918945. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07312-5.