» Articles » PMID: 25590558

Meiotic Crossover Patterns: Obligatory Crossover, Interference and Homeostasis in a Single Process

Overview
Journal Cell Cycle
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 2015 Jan 16
PMID 25590558
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During meiosis, crossover recombination is tightly regulated. A spatial patterning phenomenon known as interference ensures that crossovers are well-spaced along the chromosomes. Additionally, every pair of homologs acquires at least one crossover. A third feature, crossover homeostasis, buffers the system such that the number of crossovers remains steady despite decreases or increases in the number of earlier recombinational interactions. Here we summarize recent work from our laboratory supporting the idea that all 3 of these aspects are intrinsic consequences of a single basic process and suggesting that the underlying logic of this process corresponds to that embodied in a particular (beam-film) model.

Citing Articles

Crossovers are regulated by a conserved and disordered synaptonemal complex domain.

Neves A, cavka I, Rausch T, Kohler S Nucleic Acids Res. 2025; 53(4).

PMID: 39964475 PMC: 11833701. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkaf095.


Contribution of crossing over to genetic variance in maize and wheat populations.

Bernardo R Plant Genome. 2025; 18(1):e20552.

PMID: 39780037 PMC: 11711292. DOI: 10.1002/tpg2.20552.


Distinct and interdependent functions of three RING proteins regulate recombination during mammalian meiosis.

Ito M, Yun Y, Kulkarni D, Lee S, Sandhu S, Nunez B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2025; 122(2):e2412961121.

PMID: 39761402 PMC: 11745341. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2412961121.


A pedigree-based map of crossovers and non-crossovers in aye-ayes ().

Versoza C, Lloret-Villas A, Jensen J, Pfeifer S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 39605366 PMC: 11601232. DOI: 10.1101/2024.11.08.622675.


FIGL1 attenuates meiotic interhomolog repair and is counteracted by the RAD51 paralog XRCC2 and the chromosome axis protein ASY1 during meiosis.

Emmenecker C, Pakzad S, Ture F, Guerin J, Hurel A, Chambon A New Phytol. 2024; 244(6):2442-2457.

PMID: 39420761 PMC: 11579446. DOI: 10.1111/nph.20181.


References
1.
Jones G, Franklin F . Meiotic crossing-over: obligation and interference. Cell. 2006; 126(2):246-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.07.010. View

2.
Maeshima K, Laemmli U . A two-step scaffolding model for mitotic chromosome assembly. Dev Cell. 2003; 4(4):467-80. DOI: 10.1016/s1534-5807(03)00092-3. View

3.
Berchowitz L, Copenhaver G . Genetic interference: don't stand so close to me. Curr Genomics. 2010; 11(2):91-102. PMC: 2874225. DOI: 10.2174/138920210790886835. View

4.
Kleckner N, Storlazzi A, Zickler D . Coordinate variation in meiotic pachytene SC length and total crossover/chiasma frequency under conditions of constant DNA length. Trends Genet. 2003; 19(11):623-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2003.09.004. View

5.
Gruhn J, Rubio C, Broman K, Hunt P, Hassold T . Cytological studies of human meiosis: sex-specific differences in recombination originate at, or prior to, establishment of double-strand breaks. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12):e85075. PMC: 3869931. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085075. View