» Articles » PMID: 25586372

Does Prewarming the I-gel Supraglottic Airway Device Fit the Larynx Better Compared to Keeping It at Room Temperature for Non-paralysed, Sedated Patients: a Randomised Controlled Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2015 Jan 15
PMID 25586372
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to test the hypothesis that the i-gel supraglottic airway device would fit the larynx and provide better sealing pressure if prewarmed to 42°C relative to the device kept at room temperature in non-paralysed, sedated patients.

Methods: A total of 74 adult patients were assigned to the warm (i-gel prewarmed to 42°C; W group; 37 patients) or the control (i-gel kept at room temperature; C group; 37 patients) groups. Anaesthesia was induced with propofol and fentanyl. The i-gel was prewarmed to 42°C for 30 min before insertion in the W group, but kept at room temperature (approximately 23°C) for the C group. The number of attempts made until successful insertion and sealing pressure were compared between the two groups.

Results: Insertion was successful with one attempt in 35 cases each for the W and C groups. Two attempts were needed in two cases for the W group and one case for the C group. There was one failed attempt in the C group, but none in the W group. None of the differences between the two groups were significant (p=0.51). Sealing pressure was slightly, but not significantly, higher in the W group than in the C group (W group 22.6±6.1 cm H2O; C group 20.7±6.1 cm H2O; p=0.15).

Conclusions: Prewarming of the i-gel to 42°C did not increase the success rate of insertion, nor did it significantly increase sealing pressure in anaesthetised, non-paralysed patients. Our data suggest that we can keep the i-gel at room temperature for emergency airway management for non-paralysed, sedated patients.

Trial Registration Number: University Medical Information Network, Japan 000012287.

Citing Articles

Comparing leak pressure of LMA ProSeal™ versus i-gel at head rotation: a randomized controlled trial.

Chaki T, Koizumi M, Tachibana S, Matsumoto T, Kumagai T, Hashimoto Y Can J Anaesth. 2023; 71(1):66-76.

PMID: 38017196 DOI: 10.1007/s12630-023-02648-3.


Prewarming i-gel laryngeal mask for mechanical ventilation: a meta-analysis of randomised control trials and trial sequential analysis.

Zheng J, Du L, Wang J, Zhang L, Chen G BMJ Open. 2021; 11(8):e045461.

PMID: 34376440 PMC: 8356164. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045461.


Comparison of Proseal LMA with i-Gel in children under controlled ventilation: a prospective randomised clinical study.

Shiveshi P, Anandaswamy T Braz J Anesthesiol. 2021; 72(2):247-252.

PMID: 33823205 PMC: 9373209. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjane.2021.02.042.


Influence of temperature on volume, weight and density changes of i-gel masks.

Martin C, Piekarski F, Mutlak H, Schalk R, Dubinski D, Zacharowski K Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2020; 52(2):119-125.

PMID: 32191829 PMC: 10176517. DOI: 10.5114/ait.2020.93416.


Does prewarming of i-gel improve insertion and ventilation in anaesthetised and paralysed patients? A prospective, randomised, control trial.

Reddy A, Varghese N, Herekar B, Shenoy U Saudi J Anaesth. 2019; 13(3):215-221.

PMID: 31333366 PMC: 6625302. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_110_19.

References
1.
Ikeda A, Isono S, Sato Y, Yogo H, Sato J, Ishikawa T . Effects of muscle relaxants on mask ventilation in anesthetized persons with normal upper airway anatomy. Anesthesiology. 2012; 117(3):487-93. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182668670. View

2.
Komasawa N, Ueki R, Yamamoto N, Atagi K, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y . Comparison of air-Q(®) and Soft Seal(®) laryngeal mask for airway management by novice doctors during infant chest compression: a manikin study. Resuscitation. 2011; 83(3):365-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.08.025. View

3.
Kohama H, Komasawa N, Ueki R, Samma A, Nakagawa M, Nishi S . Comparison of Supreme(®) and Soft Seal(®) laryngeal masks for airway management during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in novice doctors: a manikin study. J Anesth. 2010; 25(1):98-103. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-1054-7. View

4.
Theiler L, Kleine-Brueggeney M, Kaiser D, Urwyler N, Luyet C, Vogt A . Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(1):55-62. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181a4c6b9. View

5.
Komasawa N, Ueki R, Itani M, Nishi S, Kaminoh Y . Validation of the Pentax-AWS Airwayscope utility as an intubation device during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on the ground. J Anesth. 2010; 24(4):582-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00540-010-0950-1. View