» Articles » PMID: 25580377

Mediation Analysis with Multiple Mediators

Overview
Publisher De Gruyter
Specialty Public Health
Date 2015 Jan 13
PMID 25580377
Citations 297
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Recent advances in the causal inference literature on mediation have extended traditional approaches to direct and indirect effects to settings that allow for interactions and non-linearities. In this paper, these approaches from causal inference are further extended to settings in which multiple mediators may be of interest. Two analytic approaches, one based on regression and one based on weighting are proposed to estimate the effect mediated through multiple mediators and the effects through other pathways. The approaches proposed here accommodate exposure-mediator interactions and, to a certain extent, mediator-mediator interactions as well. The methods handle binary or continuous mediators and binary, continuous or count outcomes. When the mediators affect one another, the strategy of trying to assess direct and indirect effects one mediator at a time will in general fail; the approach given in this paper can still be used. A characterization is moreover given as to when the sum of the mediated effects for multiple mediators considered separately will be equal to the mediated effect of all of the mediators considered jointly. The approach proposed in this paper is robust to unmeasured common causes of two or more mediators.

Citing Articles

Mediation CNN (Med-CNN) Model for High-Dimensional Mediation Data.

Li Y, Zhang Z, Saarela O, Sharma D, Xu W Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076446 PMC: 11899585. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26051819.


From genetic disposition to academic achievement: The mediating role of non-cognitive skills across development.

Zhou Q, Liao W, Allegrini A, Allegrini A, Rimfeld K, Wertz J bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 40060469 PMC: 11888423. DOI: 10.1101/2025.02.27.640510.


Composite variable bias: causal analysis of weight outcomes.

Ali R, Prestwich A, Ge J, Griffiths C, Allmendinger R, Shahgholian A Int J Obes (Lond). 2025; .

PMID: 40057559 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-025-01732-6.


Impact of the polygenic risk scores for attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in Alzheimer's disease.

Leffa D, Povala G, Bellaver B, Ferrari-Souza J, Ferreira P, Lussier F Alzheimers Dement. 2025; 21(2):e70003.

PMID: 39998851 PMC: 11853731. DOI: 10.1002/alz.70003.


Adherence to the Mediterranean Diet and Obesity-Linked Cancer Risk in EPIC.

Aguilera-Buenosvinos I, Morales Berstein F, Gonzalez-Gil E, Dossus L, Gunter M, Biessy C JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(2):e2461031.

PMID: 39998833 PMC: 11862969. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.61031.


References
1.
Robins J, Greenland S . Identifiability and exchangeability for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 1992; 3(2):143-55. DOI: 10.1097/00001648-199203000-00013. View

2.
VanderWeele T, Lantos J, Siddique J, Lauderdale D . A comparison of four prenatal care indices in birth outcome models: comparable results for predicting small-for-gestational-age outcome but different results for preterm birth or infant mortality. J Clin Epidemiol. 2008; 62(4):438-45. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.08.001. View

3.
VanderWeele T . Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis for direct and indirect effects. Epidemiology. 2010; 21(4):540-51. PMC: 4231822. DOI: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e3181df191c. View

4.
Imai K, Keele L, Tingley D . A general approach to causal mediation analysis. Psychol Methods. 2010; 15(4):309-34. DOI: 10.1037/a0020761. View

5.
VanderWeele T, Vansteelandt S . Odds ratios for mediation analysis for a dichotomous outcome. Am J Epidemiol. 2010; 172(12):1339-48. PMC: 2998205. DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwq332. View