» Articles » PMID: 25574502

Recovery Support for Adolescents with Substance Use Disorders: The Impact of Recovery Support Telephone Calls Provided by Pre-Professional Volunteers

Overview
Publisher JSciMed Central
Date 2015 Jan 10
PMID 25574502
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The present quasi-experiment examined the direct and indirect effects of recovery support telephone calls following adolescent substance use disorder treatment. Six-month outcome data from 202 adolescents who had received recovery support calls from primarily pre-professional (i.e., college-level social service students) volunteers was compared to 6-month outcome data from a matched comparison sample of adolescents (n = 404). Results suggested adolescents in the recovery support sample had significantly greater reductions in their recovery environment risk relative to the comparison sample (β = -.17). Path analysis also suggested that the reduction in recovery environment risk produced by recovery support calls had indirect impacts (via recovery environment risk) on reductions in social risk (β = .22), substance use (β = .23), and substance-related problems (β = .16). Finally, moderation analyses suggested the effects of recovery support calls did not differ by gender, but were significantly greater for adolescents with lower levels of treatment readiness. In addition to providing rare empirical support for the effectiveness of recovery support services, an important contribution of this study is that it provides evidence that recovery support services do not necessarily have to be "peer-based," at least in terms of the recovery support service provider having the experiential credentials of being "in recovery." If replicated, this latter finding may have particularly important implications for helping increase the recovery support workforce.

Citing Articles

Volunteer Recovery Support for Adolescents: Using propensity score based methods to understand dosage effects within a randomized controlled trial.

Godley M, Passetti L, Hunter B, Griffin B J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021; 132:108637.

PMID: 34654584 PMC: 8671322. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108637.


IDENTIFYING PREDICTORS OF SUBSTANCE USE AND RECIDIVISM OUTCOME TRAJECTORIES AMONG DRUG TREATMENT COURT CLIENTS.

Wilson J, Bandyopadhyay S, Yang H, Cerulli C, Morse D Crim Justice Behav. 2020; 45(4):447-467.

PMID: 33060870 PMC: 7556699. DOI: 10.1177/0093854817737806.


A randomized trial of Volunteer Recovery Support for Adolescents (VRSA) following residential treatment discharge.

Godley M, Passetti L, Hunter B, Greene A, White W J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019; 98:15-25.

PMID: 30665599 PMC: 6376485. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.014.


The Volunteer Recovery Support for Adolescents (VRSA) experiment: Recruiting, retaining, training, and supervising volunteers to implement recovery monitoring and support services.

Passetti L, Godley M, Greene A, White W J Subst Abuse Treat. 2019; 98:1-8.

PMID: 30665598 PMC: 6352309. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.11.015.


Adolescent Community Reinforcement Approach implementation and treatment outcomes for youth with opioid problem use.

Godley M, Passetti L, Subramaniam G, Funk R, Smith J, Meyers R Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017; 174:9-16.

PMID: 28282523 PMC: 5400724. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.12.029.


References
1.
McKay J . Continuing care research: what we have learned and where we are going. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2009; 36(2):131-45. PMC: 2670779. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2008.10.004. View

2.
Mehrotra D, Li X, Liu J, Lu K . Analysis of longitudinal clinical trials with missing data using multiple imputation in conjunction with robust regression. Biometrics. 2012; 68(4):1250-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2012.01780.x. View

3.
McKay J, van Horn D, Oslin D, Ivey M, Drapkin M, Coviello D . Extended telephone-based continuing care for alcohol dependence: 24-month outcomes and subgroup analyses. Addiction. 2011; 106(10):1760-9. PMC: 3174323. DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2011.03483.x. View

4.
Lennox R, Dennis M, Ives M, White M . The construct and predictive validity of different approaches to combining urine and self-reported drug use measures among older adolescents after substance abuse treatment. Am J Addict. 2006; 15 Suppl 1:92-101. DOI: 10.1080/10550490601006089. View

5.
Blodgett J, Maisel N, Fuh I, Wilbourne P, Finney J . How effective is continuing care for substance use disorders? A meta-analytic review. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2013; 46(2):87-97. PMC: 3840113. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsat.2013.08.022. View