» Articles » PMID: 25573984

Two-year Clinical Outcome from the Iberian Registry Patients After Left Atrial Appendage Closure

Abstract

Aims: The aim of this study was to observe the percentage of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events over a 2-year follow-up in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) undergoing closure of the left atrial appendage (LAA) with an occlusion device. Observed events and CHADS2 (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke history), CHA2DS2-VASc (also adding: vascular disease and sex) and HAS-BLED (hypertension, abnormal liver/renal function, stroke history, bleeding predisposition, labile international normalised ratios, elderly, drugs/alcohol use)-predicted events were compared.

Methods: LAA closure with an occlusion device was performed in 167 NVAF patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants and recruited from 12 hospitals between 2009 and 2013. At least two transoesophageal echocardiograms were performed in the first 6 months postimplantation. Antithrombotics included clopidogrel and aspirin. Patients were monitored for death, stroke, major and relevant bleeding and hospitalisation for concomitant conditions. Mean age was 74.68±8.58, median follow-up was 24 months, 5.38% had intraoperative complications and implantation was successful in 94.6% of subjects. Mortality during follow-up was 10.8%, mostly (9.5%) non-cardiac related. Bleeding occurred in 10.1% of subjects, 5.7% major and 4.4% minor though relevant, and 4.4% suffered stroke. Major bleeding and stroke/transient ischaemic attack events within 2 years (annual event rates, 290 patients/year) were less frequent than expected from CHADS2 (2.4% vs 9.6%), CHA2DS2-VASc (2.4% vs 8.3%) and HAS-BLED (3.1% vs 6.6%) risk scores (p<0.001, p=0.003, p=0.047, respectively).

Conclusions: LAA closure with an occlusion device in patients contraindicated for oral anticoagulants is a therapeutic option associated with fewer thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events than expected from risk scores, particularly in the second year postimplantation.

Citing Articles

Incidence and predictors of device-related thrombus after left atrial appendage closure with Watchman device.

Maksym J, Scislo P, Kaplon-Cieslicka A, Huczek Z, Marchel M, Kochman J Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2024; 20(2):164-171.

PMID: 39022721 PMC: 11249867. DOI: 10.5114/aic.2024.140315.


Effectiveness and Safety of an Outpatient Program for Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion.

Blanco-Fernandez F, Antunez-Muinos P, Nunez-Garcia J, Lopez-Tejero S, Barreira-de Sousa G, Garcia-Monsalvo M J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959194 PMC: 10648316. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216728.


Meta-analysis of postoperative antithrombotic therapy after left atrial appendage occlusion.

Li S, Wang J, Hui X, Zhu H, Wang B, Xu H J Int Med Res. 2020; 48(11):300060520966478.

PMID: 33249962 PMC: 7708721. DOI: 10.1177/0300060520966478.


Major Bleeding Predictors in Patients with Left Atrial Appendage Closure: The Iberian Registry II.

Lopez-Minguez J, Nogales-Asensio J, Infante de Oliveira E, Santos L, Ruiz-Salmeron R, Arzamendi-Aizpurua D J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7).

PMID: 32707736 PMC: 7408988. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072295.


Left Atrial Appendages Occlusion: Current Status and Prospective.

Sharma S, Park P, Lakkireddy D Korean Circ J. 2018; 48(8):692-704.

PMID: 30073807 PMC: 6072669. DOI: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0231.