» Articles » PMID: 25573687

The Role of Latency Period in Quality Management for Free-breathing Coronary Wall MRI

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Radiology
Date 2015 Jan 10
PMID 25573687
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The aim of the present study was to determine the effects of the latency period on the performance of free-breathing coronary wall MRI. With the approval of IRB, 70 participants were recruited for coronary wall magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and provided written informed consent. In 35 subjects, right coronary segments (RCA1-3) were imaged first; in the remaining subjects, the left coronary segments (LM and LAD1-3) were imaged first. The images were classified into groups; group 1 contained right coronary images from the subjects whose right coronary segments were imaged first and left coronary images from the subjects whose left coronary segments were imaged first. Group 2 contained the other coronary segments. The image scores (ranked1-3), latency periods, drift of the position of the navigator (NAV), scan efficiency were compared between image groups. Image group 1 has higher scores (1.66 ± 0.55 vs. 1.46 ± 0.51), shorter latency periods (32.04 ± 4.24 vs. 44.22 ± 5.57 min), lower drift in the location of the NAV (1.90 ± 1.27 mm vs. 2.61 ± 1.71 mm) and higher scan efficiency (32.7 ± 7.6 vs. 29.9 ± 7.9%) than group 2. Long latency periods have a significantly negative impact on the image quality of coronary wall MRI.

Citing Articles

Cine magnetic resonance imaging detects shorter cardiac rest periods in postcapillary pulmonary hypertension.

Lin K, Sarnari R, Pathrose A, Gordon D, Markl M, Carr J Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2022; 24(4):446-453.

PMID: 35718877 PMC: 10226745. DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jeac113.


Cardiovascular imaging 2015 in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging.

Bezerra H, Costa R, Reiber J, Schoenhagen P, Stillman A, De Sutter J Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016; 32(5):697-709.

PMID: 27086358 DOI: 10.1007/s10554-016-0877-1.

References
1.
Fayad Z, Fuster V, Fallon J, Jayasundera T, Worthley S, Helft G . Noninvasive in vivo human coronary artery lumen and wall imaging using black-blood magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000; 102(5):506-10. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.5.506. View

2.
Botnar R, Stuber M, Kissinger K, Kim W, Spuentrup E, Manning W . Noninvasive coronary vessel wall and plaque imaging with magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2000; 102(21):2582-7. DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.102.21.2582. View

3.
Thorp D, Owens R, Whitehouse G, Dewey M . Subjective experiences of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol. 1990; 41(4):276-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)81665-4. View

4.
Mackenzie R, Sims C, Owens R, Dixon A . Patients' perceptions of magnetic resonance imaging. Clin Radiol. 1995; 50(3):137-43. DOI: 10.1016/s0009-9260(05)83042-9. View

5.
Wollman D, Beeri M, Weinberger M, Cheng H, Silverman J, Prohovnik I . Tolerance of MRI procedures by the oldest old. Magn Reson Imaging. 2004; 22(9):1299-304. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2004.08.009. View