» Articles » PMID: 25573091

Impact of Head and Neck Cancer Adaptive Radiotherapy to Spare the Parotid Glands and Decrease the Risk of Xerostomia

Overview
Journal Radiat Oncol
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2015 Jan 10
PMID 25573091
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Large anatomical variations occur during the course of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). The risks are therefore a parotid glands (PG) overdose and a xerostomia increase. The purposes of the study were to estimate: - the PG overdose and the xerostomia risk increase during a "standard" IMRT (IMRTstd); - the benefits of an adaptive IMRT (ART) with weekly replanning to spare the PGs and limit the risk of xerostomia.

Material And Methods: Fifteen patients received radical IMRT (70 Gy) for LAHNC. Weekly CTs were used to estimate the dose distributions delivered during the treatment, corresponding either to the initial planning (IMRTstd) or to weekly replanning (ART). PGs dose were recalculated at the fraction, from the weekly CTs. PG cumulated doses were then estimated using deformable image registration. The following PG doses were compared: pre-treatment planned dose, per-treatment IMRTstd and ART. The corresponding estimated risks of xerostomia were also compared. Correlations between anatomical markers and dose differences were searched.

Results: Compared to the initial planning, a PG overdose was observed during IMRTstd for 59% of the PGs, with an average increase of 3.7 Gy (10.0 Gy maximum) for the mean dose, and of 8.2% (23.9% maximum) for the risk of xerostomia. Compared to the initial planning, weekly replanning reduced the PG mean dose for all the patients (p<0.05). In the overirradiated PG group, weekly replanning reduced the mean dose by 5.1 Gy (12.2 Gy maximum) and the absolute risk of xerostomia by 11% (p<0.01) (30% maximum). The PG overdose and the dosimetric benefit of replanning increased with the tumor shrinkage and the neck thickness reduction (p<0.001).

Conclusion: During the course of LAHNC IMRT, around 60% of the PGs are overdosed of 4 Gy. Weekly replanning decreased the PG mean dose by 5 Gy, and therefore by 11% the xerostomia risk.

Citing Articles

Adaptive radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer: The importance of reduced margins.

Enocson H, Haraldsson A, Engstrom P, Ceberg S, Gebre-Medhin M, Adrian G Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2025; 33:100696.

PMID: 39897022 PMC: 11787698. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2025.100696.


Retrospective Comparison of Geometrical Accuracy among Atlas-based Auto-segmentation, Deep Learning Auto-segmentation, and Deformable Image Registration in the Treatment Replanning for Adaptive Radiotherapy of Head-and-Neck Cancer.

Nagayasu Y, Inui S, Ueda Y, Masaoka A, Tominaga M, Miyazaki M J Med Phys. 2024; 49(3):335-342.

PMID: 39526151 PMC: 11548068. DOI: 10.4103/jmp.jmp_39_24.


Does adaptive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer favorably impact dosimetric, clinical, and toxicity outcomes?: A review.

Simopoulou F, Kyrgias G, Georgakopoulos I, Avgousti R, Armpilia C, Skarlos P Medicine (Baltimore). 2024; 103(26):e38529.

PMID: 38941415 PMC: 11466102. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038529.


TransAnaNet: Transformer-based Anatomy Change Prediction Network for Head and Neck Cancer Patient Radiotherapy.

Chen M, Wang K, Dohopolski M, Morgan H, Sher D, Wang J ArXiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38764596 PMC: 11100917.


Interdisciplinary Collaboration in Head and Neck Cancer Care: Optimizing Oral Health Management for Patients Undergoing Radiation Therapy.

Kutuk T, Atak E, Villa A, Kalman N, Kaiser A Curr Oncol. 2024; 31(4):2092-2108.

PMID: 38668058 PMC: 11049200. DOI: 10.3390/curroncol31040155.


References
1.
Duma M, Kampfer S, Schuster T, Winkler C, Geinitz H . Adaptive radiotherapy for soft tissue changes during helical tomotherapy for head and neck cancer. Strahlenther Onkol. 2012; 188(3):243-7. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-0041-8. View

2.
Wu Q, Chi Y, Chen P, Krauss D, Yan D, Martinez A . Adaptive replanning strategies accounting for shrinkage in head and neck IMRT. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009; 75(3):924-32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.047. View

3.
Budach W, Bolke E, Fietkau R, Buchali A, Wendt T, Popp W . Evaluation of time, attendance of medical staff, and resources during radiotherapy for head and neck cancer patients: the DEGRO-QUIRO trial. Strahlenther Onkol. 2011; 187(8):449-60. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-011-2273-z. View

4.
Berwouts D, Olteanu L, Duprez F, Vercauteren T, De Gersem W, De Neve W . Three-phase adaptive dose-painting-by-numbers for head-and-neck cancer: initial results of the phase I clinical trial. Radiother Oncol. 2013; 107(3):310-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.04.002. View

5.
LYMAN J . Complication probability as assessed from dose-volume histograms. Radiat Res Suppl. 1985; 8:S13-9. View