» Articles » PMID: 25566776

Prevalence of Cytauxzoon Felis Infection in Healthy Cats from Enzootic Areas in Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma

Overview
Journal Parasit Vectors
Publisher Biomed Central
Date 2015 Jan 9
PMID 25566776
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Infection with Cytauxzoon felis in domestic cats can cause fever, lethargy, depression, inappetence, icterus, and often death. With a high mortality rate, cytauxzoonosis was historically considered a fatal disease. Within the last 15 years, cats with or without treatment have been recognized as chronically infected survivors of C. felis infection. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of C. felis in healthy domestic cats from Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma.

Methods: Infection with C. felis was determined using DNA extracted from anticoagulated whole blood and PCR amplification using C. felis-specific primers. Chi-square, Fisher's exact tests, and odds ratios were used to compare proportions of cats infected with C. felis.

Results: Blood samples were collected from 902 healthy domestic cats between October 2008 and April 2012. DNA from Cytauxzoon felis was detected in 56 of 902 (6.2%; 95% confidence interval, 4.7-7.9) samples. The highest prevalence of C. felis infection (15.5%; 10.3-21.7) was observed in cats from Arkansas, followed by cats from Missouri (12.9%; 6.1-24.0), and cats from Oklahoma (3.4%; 2.2-5.1). Cats sampled in Arkansas and Missouri were 5.1 and 4.2, respectively, times more likely to be chronically infected with C. felis than cats from Oklahoma.

Conclusions: Infection with C. felis is common in domestic cats through Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. The high prevalence of C. felis reported herein suggests that infected domestic cats are likely reservoirs of infection for naive felines. The high prevalence of C. felis substantiates the importance for the use of approved acaricides on cats to prevent cytauxzoonosis.

Citing Articles

The Establishment of a Novel In Vitro System for Culturing .

Weerarathne P, Reichard M, Miller C, Scimeca R Pathogens. 2024; 13(7).

PMID: 39057792 PMC: 11279574. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13070565.


Cytauxzoonosis in Indiana, USA: a case series of cats infected with (2018-2022).

Reichard M, Cotey S, Dangoudoubiyam S, Weerarathne P, Tussey K, Wilkes R J Feline Med Surg. 2024; 26(5):1098612X231224139.

PMID: 38695724 PMC: 11156240. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X231224139.


Can Domestic Cats Act as Reservoirs of ?.

Diaz-Sanchez A, Cabezas-Cruz A Pathogens. 2023; 12(2).

PMID: 36839538 PMC: 9967219. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12020266.


: An Overview.

Wikander Y, Reif K Pathogens. 2023; 12(1).

PMID: 36678481 PMC: 9860807. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12010133.


Clinicopathological findings and risk factors associated with spp. infection in cats: A case-control study (2008-2021).

Carli E, Solano-Gallego L, De Arcangeli S, Ventura L, Ligorio E, Furlanello T Front Vet Sci. 2022; 9:976173.

PMID: 36439359 PMC: 9685617. DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2022.976173.


References
1.
Birkenheuer A, Le J, Valenzisi A, Tucker M, Levy M, Breitschwerdt E . Cytauxzoon felis infection in cats in the mid-Atlantic states: 34 cases (1998-2004). J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006; 228(4):568-71. DOI: 10.2460/javma.228.4.568. View

2.
Jackson C, Fisher T . Fatal cytauxzoonosis in a Kentucky cat (Felis domesticus). Vet Parasitol. 2006; 139(1-3):192-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2006.02.039. View

3.
Haber M, Tucker M, Marr H, Levy J, Burgess J, Lappin M . The detection of Cytauxzoon felis in apparently healthy free-roaming cats in the USA. Vet Parasitol. 2007; 146(3-4):316-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.02.029. View

4.
Harvey J, Dunbar M, Norton T, Yabsley M . Laboratory findings in acute Cytauxzoon felis infection in cougars (Puma concolor couguar) in Florida. J Zoo Wildl Med. 2007; 38(2):285-91. DOI: 10.1638/1042-7260(2007)038[0285:LFIACF]2.0.CO;2. View

5.
Reichard M, Baum K, Cadenhead S, Snider T . Temporal occurrence and environmental risk factors associated with cytauxzoonosis in domestic cats. Vet Parasitol. 2008; 152(3-4):314-20. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2007.12.031. View