» Articles » PMID: 25561560

A Generation at Risk: Young Investigators and the Future of the Biomedical Workforce

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 2015 Jan 7
PMID 25561560
Citations 79
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A number of distressing trends, including a decline in the share of key research grants going to younger scientists, as well as a steady rise in the age at which investigators receive their first funding, are now a decades-long feature of the US biomedical research workforce. Working committees have proposed recommendations, policy makers have implemented reforms, and yet the trajectory of our funding regime away from young scientists has only worsened. An investigation of some of the major factors and their geneses at play in explaining the increasing average age to first RO1 is presented. Recommendations related to funding, peer review, career paths, and the university-government partnership are provided.

Citing Articles

Gender and race in neurotrauma: part 1-identifying inequalities in leadership, academics, and clinical trial management.

Churchill I, Sue T, Parr A, Tsai E Front Neurol. 2024; 15:1383713.

PMID: 39544992 PMC: 11560465. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1383713.


Empowering the next generation in neuro-oncology: Introduction of the EANO Career Boost Initiative.

Lohmann P, Duerinck J, van der Meulen M, Mitrea D, Short S, Geurts M Neurooncol Adv. 2024; 6(1):vdae167.

PMID: 39445339 PMC: 11497602. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae167.


The rise of teamwork and career prospects in academic science.

Andalon M, de Fontenay C, Ginther D, Lim K Nat Biotechnol. 2024; 42(8):1314-1319.

PMID: 39143163 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02351-8.


Is it time to reduce the length of postgraduate training for physician-scientists in internal medicine?.

Gallagher E, Conlin P, Kazmierczak B, Vyas J, Ajijola O, Kontos C JCI Insight. 2024; 9(10).

PMID: 38775155 PMC: 11141926. DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.178214.


The impact of gender diversity on junior versus senior biomedical scientists' NIH research awards.

Liu C, Yalcinkaya B, Back A, Ding W Nat Biotechnol. 2024; 42(5):815-819.

PMID: 38760551 DOI: 10.1038/s41587-024-02234-y.


References
1.
Kaiser J . National Institutes of Health. Zerhouni's parting message: make room for young scientists. Science. 2008; 322(5903):834-5. DOI: 10.1126/science.322.5903.834. View

2.
Farber G, Weiss L . Core facilities: maximizing the return on investment. Sci Transl Med. 2011; 3(95):95cm21. PMC: 3161425. DOI: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3002421. View

3.
Fang F, Casadevall A . NIH peer review reform--change we need, or lipstick on a pig?. Infect Immun. 2009; 77(3):929-32. PMC: 2643622. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.01567-08. View

4.
Kaplan D . Social choice at NIH: the principle of complementarity. FASEB J. 2011; 25(11):3763-4. DOI: 10.1096/fj.11-191015. View

5.
Ginther D, Schaffer W, Schnell J, Masimore B, Liu F, Haak L . Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011; 333(6045):1015-9. PMC: 3412416. DOI: 10.1126/science.1196783. View