Trends, Fads and ART!
Overview
Reproductive Medicine
Authors
Affiliations
Morphological selection techniques of gametes and embryos are of current interest to clinical practice in ART. Although intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI), time lapse imaging morphometry (TLIM) or quantification of chromosome numbers (PGS) are potentially useful in research, they have not been shown to be of statistically predictive value and, thus, have only limited clinical usefulness. We make the point that morphological markers alone cannot predict the success of the early embryo, which depends on the correct orchestration of a myriad of physiological and biochemical activation events that progress independently of the maternal or zygotic genome. Since previous attempts to identify metabolic markers for embryo quality have failed and there is no evidence that the intrinsic nature of gametes and embryos can be improved in the laboratory, embryologists can only minimize environmental or operator induced damage while these cells are manipulated ex vivo.
Automation in ART: Paving the Way for the Future of Infertility Treatment.
Abdullah K, Atazhanova T, Chavez-Badiola A, Shivhare S Reprod Sci. 2022; 30(4):1006-1016.
PMID: 35922741 PMC: 10160149. DOI: 10.1007/s43032-022-00941-y.
The impact of patient preselection on reported IVF outcomes.
Gleicher N, Kushnir V, Barad D J Assist Reprod Genet. 2016; 33(4):455-9.
PMID: 26861966 PMC: 4818643. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-016-0673-9.
Racowsky C, Kovacs P, Martins W J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015; 32(7):1025-30.
PMID: 26126876 PMC: 4531870. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0510-6.