» Articles » PMID: 25559654

Affective Processing Requires Awareness

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 2015 Jan 7
PMID 25559654
Citations 18
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Studies using backward masked emotional stimuli suggest that affective processing may occur outside visual awareness and imply primacy of affective over semantic processing, yet these experiments have not strictly controlled for the participants' awareness of the stimuli. Here we directly compared the primacy of affective versus semantic categorization of biologically relevant stimuli in 5 experiments (n = 178) using explicit (semantic and affective discrimination; Experiments 1-3) and implicit (semantic and affective priming; Experiments 4-5) measures. The same stimuli were used in semantic and affective tasks. Visual awareness was manipulated by varying exposure duration of the masked stimuli, and subjective level of stimulus awareness was measured after each trial using a 4-point perceptual awareness scale. When participants reported no awareness of the stimuli, semantic and affective categorization were at chance level and priming scores did not differ from zero. When participants were even partially aware of the stimuli, (a) both semantic and affective categorization could be performed above chance level with equal accuracy, (b) semantic categorization was faster than affective categorization, and (c) both semantic and affective priming were observed. Affective categorization speed was linearly dependent on semantic categorization speed, suggesting dependence of affective processing on semantic recognition. Manipulations of affective and semantic categorization tasks revealed a hierarchy of categorization operations beginning with basic-level semantic categorization and ending with superordinate level affective categorization. We conclude that both implicit and explicit affective and semantic categorization is dependent on visual awareness, and that affective recognition follows semantic categorization.

Citing Articles

In Search of an Integrative Method to Study Unconscious Processing: An Application of Bayesian and General Recognition Theory Models to the Processing of Hierarchical Patterns in the Absence of Awareness.

Prieto A, Montoro P, Jimenez M, Hinojosa J J Cogn. 2025; 8(1):6.

PMID: 39803183 PMC: 11720486. DOI: 10.5334/joc.411.


Neural dynamics of attentional resource allocation in early visual cortex: emotional scenes produce competitive interactions.

de Echegaray J, Keil A, Muller M Cereb Cortex. 2024; 34(12).

PMID: 39656648 PMC: 11630067. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhae428.


Consciousness Under the Spotlight: The Problem of Measuring Subjective Experience.

Jimenez M, Prieto A, Hinojosa J, Montoro P Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2024; 16(1):e1697.

PMID: 39449331 PMC: 11652689. DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1697.


The Relation Between Subjective and Objective Measures of Visual Awareness: Current Evidence, Attempt of a Synthesis and Future Research Directions.

Kiefer M, Kammer T J Cogn. 2024; 7(1):59.

PMID: 39035071 PMC: 11259121. DOI: 10.5334/joc.381.


Ultrahigh Field fMRI Reveals Different Roles of the Temporal and Frontoparietal Cortices in Subjective Awareness.

Solanas M, Zhan M, de Gelder B J Neurosci. 2024; 44(20).

PMID: 38531633 PMC: 11097282. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-23.2023.