» Articles » PMID: 25559426

A New Finite Element Approach for Near Real-time Simulation of Light Propagation in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Tumors

Overview
Journal Lasers Surg Med
Date 2015 Jan 7
PMID 25559426
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background And Objectives: Several clinical studies suggest that interstitial photodynamic therapy (I-PDT) may benefit patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC). For I-PDT, the therapeutic light is delivered through optical fibers inserted into the target tumor. The complex anatomy of the head and neck requires careful planning of fiber insertions. Often the fibers' location and tumor optical properties may vary from the original plan therefore pretreatment planning needs near real-time updating to account for any changes. The purpose of this work was to develop a finite element analysis (FEA) approach for near real-time simulation of light propagation in LAHNC.

Methods: Our previously developed FEA for modeling light propagation in skin tissue was modified to simulate light propagation from interstitial optical fibers. The modified model was validated by comparing the calculations with measurements in a phantom mimicking tumor optical properties. We investigated the impact of mesh element size and growth rate on the computation time, and defined optimal settings for the FEA. We demonstrated how the optimized FEA can be used for simulating light propagation in two cases of LAHNC amenable to I-PDT, as proof-of-concept.

Results: The modified FEA was in agreement with the measurements (P = 0.0271). The optimal maximum mesh size and growth rate were 0.005-0.02 m and 2-2.5 m/m, respectively. Using these settings the computation time for simulating light propagation in LAHNC was reduced from 25.9 to 3.7 minutes in one case, and 10.1 to 4 minutes in another case. There were minor differences (1.62%, 1.13%) between the radiant exposures calculated with either mesh in both cases.

Conclusions: Our FEA approach can be used to model light propagation from diffused optical fibers in complex heterogeneous geometries representing LAHNC. There is a range of maximum element size (MES) and maximum element growth rate (MEGR) that can be used to minimize the computation time of the FEA to 4 minutes.

Citing Articles

Computational Optimization of Irradiance and Fluence for Interstitial Photodynamic Therapy Treatment of Patients with Malignant Central Airway Obstruction.

Oakley E, Parilov E, Beeson K, Potasek M, Ivanick N, Tworek L Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(9).

PMID: 37174102 PMC: 10177073. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092636.


First-In-Human Computer-Optimized Endobronchial Ultrasound-Guided Interstitial Photodynamic Therapy for Patients With Extrabronchial or Endobronchial Obstructing Malignancies.

Ivanick N, Oakley E, Kunadharaju R, Brackett C, Bellnier D, Tworek L JTO Clin Res Rep. 2022; 3(10):100372.

PMID: 36188632 PMC: 9523383. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2022.100372.


Interstitial Photothermal Therapy Generates Durable Treatment Responses in Neuroblastoma.

Ledezma D, Balakrishnan P, Shukla A, Medina J, Chen J, Oakley E Adv Healthc Mater. 2022; 11(20):e2201084.

PMID: 35943173 PMC: 9588730. DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202201084.


In Vivo Models for Studying Interstitial Photodynamic Therapy of Locally Advanced Cancer.

Shafirstein G, Oakley E, Hamilton S, Habitzruther M, Chamberlain S, Sexton S Methods Mol Biol. 2022; 2451:151-162.

PMID: 35505016 PMC: 9904013. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-2099-1_11.


Multiphysics Modeling of Plasmonic Photothermal Heating Effects in Gold Nanoparticles and Nanoparticle Arrays.

Manrique-Bedoya S, Abdul-Moqueet M, Lopez P, Gray T, Disiena M, Locker A J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces. 2021; 124(31):17172-17182.

PMID: 34367407 PMC: 8341645. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02443.


References
1.
Lou P, Jager H, Jones L, Theodossy T, Bown S, Hopper C . Interstitial photodynamic therapy as salvage treatment for recurrent head and neck cancer. Br J Cancer. 2004; 91(3):441-6. PMC: 2409848. DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601993. View

2.
Krammer B . Vascular effects of photodynamic therapy. Anticancer Res. 2002; 21(6B):4271-7. View

3.
Marijnissen J, Star W . Calibration of isotropic light dosimetry probes based on scattering bulbs in clear media. Phys Med Biol. 1996; 41(7):1191-208. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/41/7/008. View

4.
Chen A, Phillips T, Lee N . Practical considerations in the re-irradiation of recurrent and second primary head-and-neck cancer: who, why, how, and how much?. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 81(5):1211-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.06.1998. View

5.
Davidson S, Weersink R, Haider M, Gertner M, Bogaards A, Giewercer D . Treatment planning and dose analysis for interstitial photodynamic therapy of prostate cancer. Phys Med Biol. 2009; 54(8):2293-313. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/8/003. View